:lol:

Only because we're run by the Clintons—as if you didn't know, Bill. :wink:

Clintons... could they be related to the race Clingons? From StarTrek. If anyone remembers that show. There is a strong resemblance in facial features, especially around the left eye, and the attitude is uncannily similar.

If someone can find a solid reference to this, then I'll start to understand the state the world is in today.

THAT got him banned? Not his ceaseless topic spamming and discussion killing soapboxing?
Islam is the magic word I guess?

That's what I happened to see. Anyhow, glad to hear he was such a popular guy.

Now ban the emoji users.

:sad:

If only we could ban the sources of such indoctrination just as easily.

his ceaseless topic spamming and discussion killing soapboxing? — DingoJones

This is why I deleted a lot of his posts.

Seemed like all he did was spam, made worse by his anti-discussion attitude. Like that guy who started the moral subjectivity thread. He banned yet?
I find people prosthetising to be much more intolerable than speaking out against islam as part of some conspiracy theory.

I find people prosthetising to be much more intolerable than speaking out against islam as part of some conspiracy theory. — DingoJones

Why? All they're doing is helping people by providing them with artificial limbs. Leave 'em alone.

:lol:
Fuck you lol

So what about that bartricks guy? Why hasnt he been banned yet?

Hmm, requesting bannings of other members is forbidden. lol

good call. Definite troll.

prosthetising — DingoJones

Were you aiming for "proselytizing" or "prophesying"?

The former, but I didn't the see the error. S pointed it out already lol

Clever S. I didn't get his joke right away.

@Banno-ings

Didn't you already make that joke?...

It was typed out in my comment box so I thought I had forgotten to post it...

It also could be deja vu on my part.

He’s more spicy than astringent. In fact, if memory serves, S is short for sriracha, a chili sauce that thinks it can burn but ends up being merely mildly amusing. — praxis

:razz:

I find people prosthetising to be much more intolerable than speaking out against islam as part of some conspiracy theory. — DingoJones

The question is, why are you focusing on the Islam bit and not on the "secret pedophile ring run by the Clinton's" bit?

Because anti-Clinton people are not called bigots, and anti Islamic people are called bigots. People would get banned for the latter, not the former. Since we were talking about banning, naturally I would be focusing on the islam bit.
Why? I don’t understand what you are trying to imply.

The question is, why are you focusing on the Islam bit and not on the "secret pedophile ring run by the Clinton's" bit? — Echarmion

What sort of secret is it if A Gnostic Agnostic knows about it?

What sort of secret is it if A Gnostic Agnostic knows about it? — Terrapin Station

The name says it all.

I banned @S, formerly Sapientia.

I had deleted several posts in a long-running dispute between him and another member in the Should hate speech be allowed? discussion. The posts were low quality and mostly off-topic, and @S's were often aggressive. After deleting them I posted this to them both, in the discussion:

Take your pointless dispute elsewhere, preferably not on this forum. — jamalrob

@S replied with this:

Firstly, fuck you.

And secondly, if you don't want to see discussions like that between me and him, then ban me. You have my permission, not that you need it, and I've just swore at you, so...

I didn't take the decision lightly, particularly because he has been part of this community for a long time. Almost anyone else responding to moderation in that way would have been instantly banned, and we do try to be consistent, but in this case we gave him time to retract. That never happened, so he's gone.

Note also that he had been warned about his behaviour several times before.

No comment. As I've been watching him since he joined the old PF his interest in learning turned into some strange contest between interlocutors of some inflated facetious sense of superiority. And, if it didn't go his way he'd try and flame you into oblivion.

If I were to emulate Sapentia right now it would be:

"Haha, he stood no chance against me".

If your reading this S, grow up for fucks sake!

If your reading this S, grow up for fucks sake! — Wallows

On the plus side, he would not have hesitated to correct this spelling mistake.