So, where's the evidence my brain thinks? — Bartricks
My brain does not. — Bartricks
So, where's the evidence my brain thinks? — Bartricks
Yes, I understand what panpyschism is. — Bartricks
I don't understand your reply. — Bartricks
How often do you wonder what a cup of tea thinks like? — Bartricks
I don't think I misunderstand it at all. Which premise in which of my arguments are you disputing? — Bartricks
As for panpyschism having lots of proponents - er, no it doesn't, it just has a fancy name and is associated with a philosopher who has long hair and thinks he's a rock star.
Numbers don't mean anything, it is evidence that counts. But if you're (misguidedly) interested in numbers, then my view wins hands-down. The thesis that your mind is an immaterial soul and not your brain or any other physical thing is far and away the prevailing view among reflective people, now and throughout history. — Bartricks
And as you are more concerned with who defends a view rather than the defensibility of the view — Bartricks
But I would use the word 'mind' to denote the object, whatever it may be, that has conscious states — Bartricks
I am told repeatedly that my mind is my brain, but I see no evidence that this is the case. — Bartricks
I have presented three arguments — Bartricks
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.