• Srap Tasmaner
    4.6k


    Yes, exactly that. I will try to convey what I love about Phil Dick.
  • T Clark
    13k
    We have some "real writers".Srap Tasmaner

    I always hated when people talked about "literary" science fiction. I think that was because it meant so much to me as a kid - it was people with the mind of teenagers writing for teenagers. Lots of ideas and who cares, who even knew, if the writing was any good.

    I must admit I've come around since I started reading science fiction again about 20 years ago. Anne Leckie, Martha Wells, Adrian Tchaikovsky, China Mieville, Gene Wolf, Neal Stephenson, Haruki Murakami...
  • Srap Tasmaner
    4.6k
    Neal StephensonT Clark

    The inventor of my name.

    Well there's a whole thing about being respectable that's crap, of course. SF may be "the dreams our stuff is made of" now (book by Tom Disch about how sf took over popular culture), but so far as "literature" (pronounced derisively) is concerned, it's still a ghetto. Which is fine by me.

    I reserve my greatest disdain for mainstream folks who figure anybody can write speculative fiction. (The way celebrities seem to think anyone can write a children's book.) They don't get it. They don't get what makes it different.
  • Noble Dust
    7.8k
    Ok, I'm now re-reading UBIK, but at a snails pace because I'm taking copious notes. :grin:
  • Baden
    15.6k
    But I love 50s science fiction. It's the triumph of substance over style. There's a purity about those stories, the centrality of the idea, and the demand of the audience that the idea itself be the most interesting thing in a story, not the author's style.Srap Tasmaner

    I think I would have loved PKD too around the time I was reading Asimov, Simak, Arthur C. Clarke etc. But somehow I missed him. So, no disrespect to that, I just can't get back into it. What grabs me now is something different.
  • Srap Tasmaner
    4.6k


    I can relate. I've tried to read The Catcher in the Rye a couple times and could barely get 10 or 20 pages in. I think I might have loved it at 15, but now ...
  • frank
    14.6k
    I saw the English version, which was ok. I've been thinking I should read itT Clark

    It's cool to compare the American version to the Russian one. There's a very different tone in each. The American one pays closer attention to making sense. The plot is sketchy to begin with.
  • T Clark
    13k
    It's cool to compare the American version to the Russian one. There's a very different tone in each. The American one pays closer attention to making sense. The plot is sketchy to begin with.frank

    The book is next on my list as soon as I can get it from the library.
  • frank
    14.6k
    :up: See if they have an anthology of Hugo winners. That's good stuff.
  • T Clark
    13k
    See if they have an anthology of Hugo winners. That's good stuff.frank

    I have a friend who is going through the Hugo winners one by one till he's read them all. When he gets done with that, he plans to go through the Nebula winners not included on the Hugo list.
  • frank
    14.6k
    I have a friend who is going through the Hugo winners one by one till he's read them all. When he gets done with that, he plans to go through the Nebula winners not included on the Hugo list.T Clark

    :grin: :up:
  • Noble Dust
    7.8k


    That's a great idea; I might try that.
  • Manuel
    3.9k
    Haruki Murakami...T Clark

    He's fantasy or, magical realism. Not much sci-fi, a little in his Hard Boiled Wonderland...
  • T Clark
    13k
    He's fantasy or, magical realism. Not much sci-fi, a little in his Hard Boiled Wonderland...Manuel

    You're probably right.
  • fdrake
    5.9k


    You know of any other authors that combine traditions and sources like Brassier? It's a lot of fun to see the Patricia Churchland next to Meillassoux.
  • Jamal
    9.2k
    Just read The Unlimited Dream Company by J. G. Ballard.

    The last time I read a Ballard novel (Crash) and gave it a review, I was too hasty—I’ve since revised my estimation upwards—so I’ll refrain from saying much about this one. Once again, I didn’t like it much, but who knows what I’ll think in a few weeks. Some quotations:

    Soon after dawn I stood naked on the lawn among the drowsy pelicans.

    Again I ejaculated beside the tennis courts, and hurled my semen across the flower-beds.

    At the filling-station I ejaculated across the fuel pumps, and over the paintwork of the cars standing in front of the showroom. — Ballard

    Adrian TchaikovskyT Clark

    I like the spider stuff.

    Both from The Atrocity Exhibition. Weird stuffSrap Tasmaner

    Yes, I should probably read them as part of that book, as they were published.

    But don't miss Vermilion Sands for the other side of BallardSrap Tasmaner

    Now on my list :up:

    Currently reading The Book of Disquiet by Fernando Pessoa.
  • T Clark
    13k
    Adrian Tchaikovsky
    — T Clark

    I like the spider stuff.
    Jamal

    I have not read "Children of Time" yet. I'm sure I'll get around to it. He's really a good writer. Real name - Adrian Czajkowski.
  • Jamal
    9.2k
    Real name - Adrian CzajkowskiT Clark

    Just a different spelling. People don’t buy books by apparently unpronounceable authors.
  • T Clark
    13k
    Just a different spelling.Jamal

    Yes. I'm sure you're right. It just seemed neat to me. I like playing with names. How about "T Quark?" "T Kork." "P Pork." "C Lark." "C Tlark." "T Kralc." "Quarky." "Washington Irving."

    One dollar for the relevant literary reference.

    Speaking of which, Alan Arkin died yesterday.
  • Noble Dust
    7.8k
    QuarkyT Clark

    I approve.
  • T Clark
    13k
    Speaking of which, Alan Arkin died yesterday.T Clark

    And speaking of Alan Arkin. Another cultural reference for another dollar - "Cub is young bear."

    Twenty bucks if you can get them both.
  • Pantagruel
    3.3k
    The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume 3: Phenomenology of Cognition
    by Ernst Cassirer
  • Manuel
    3.9k
    Spent three days reading:

    The 7½ Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle by Stuart Turton.

    That was a masterpiece.

    It's been a good while since I've been engrossed in a book like that. Heck, I don't want to rush into my next book just to savor and think about what I just read.

    Books like these are the reason literature is so fascinating, giving us a privileged peak into human nature.
  • T Clark
    13k
    It's been a good while since I've been engrossed in a book like that. Heck, I don't want to rush into my next book just to savor and think about what I just read.Manuel

    Sounds interesting. I'll take a look.
  • Manuel
    3.9k


    I can't guarantee you'll like it; some aspects can be subject to (probably) fair criticism.

    It just hit me at the right time I suppose.
  • Pantagruel
    3.3k
    Barnaby Rudge
    by Charles Dickens
  • Noble Dust
    7.8k
    I picked up Libra by Don DeLillo from one of those little free libraries.
  • T Clark
    13k
    I picked up Libra by Don DeLillo from one of those little free libraries.Noble Dust

    Well !@#$% put it back and get back to reading "Ubik"
  • T Clark
    13k
    Fuck!Noble Dust

    You shouldn't be reading either DeLillo or Dick. They are both depressing. I suggest one of my favorite science ficion/fantasy books, "Goodnight Moon."

    Goodnight comb
    And goodnight brush
    Goodnight nobody
    Goodnight mush
    And goodnight to the old lady whispering “hush”
    Goodnight stars
    Goodnight air
    Good night noises everywhere
    Goodnight Moon

    For a special treat, you can listen to Christopher Walken's reading:

bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.