• Wayfarer
    23.5k
    "Reuters was paid millions of dollars by the US government for ‘large scale social deception,’” Musk proclaimed in an X post that has racked up more than 76,000 shares and 35 million views. “They’re a total scam. Just wow.” ...

    The contract was real, but the Orwellian phrase Musk seized on to suggest a shadowy conspiracy wasn’t what it seems. A slightly closer look would have revealed that the contract, signed during President Donald Trump’s first term, was for help defending against cyberattacks — that is, combating deception, not fueling it. And it went to a separate division of the company, not the news agency.

    Musk’s misinterpretation went viral, amplified by Trump as proof of corrupt ties between the “radical left” media and the “deep state.”

    The Reuters brouhaha was the latest example of what is quickly becoming a familiar playbook as Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service sweeps through federal agencies for evidence of waste, fraud and corruption. However endemic federal misspending is, Musk has repeatedly misrepresented facts on X to bolster unfounded claims of wrongdoing. Like the U.S. Agency for International Development, Politico and others before it, Reuters has been cast as a villain in a narrative spun by Musk in which nefarious left-wing schemes lurk behind programs he targets for cuts — and those who stand in the way. The world’s richest man was tapped to lead the project on the premise that he would bring his private-sector business acumen to bear on bloated government budgets. But as the owner and most followed user of X, he has also wielded a social media bully pulpit and marshaled a crowd of online loyalists to disparage and discredit each agency, program and funding recipient he targets for cuts. In some cases, the truth has been collateral damage. ...

    When his DOGE employees moved this month to wrest control of USAID, Musk took to X to call the organization “evil,” “criminal” and “a viper’s nest of radical-left Marxists who hate America.” Instead of drawing on a long history of bipartisan concerns about misspending at the agency, Musk popularized false claims that USAID and other agencies were spending millions of dollars to fund the news outlet Politico, promising that the gravy train would be “deleted.” (In fact, the agencies were paying far smaller sums for subscriptions to the outlet’s “Pro” products, which provide specialized policy news to businesses and governments.) ...

    With Musk using the social media platform he owns as a propaganda organ to promote his work for the Trump administration, “We’re seeing the emergence of state social media in the USA.”
    — Washington Post
  • ssu
    8.9k
    Musk’s misinterpretation went viral, amplified by Trump as proof of corrupt ties between the “radical left” media and the “deep state.” — Washington Post
    Not the first time when Trump finds "waste", "the deepstate" and "lousy agreements" from the decisions his own previous administration did. But who cares about the little things as those...
  • Wayfarer
    23.5k

    60 Minutes on the Woodchipping of U.S.A.I.D.
  • Paine
    2.7k
    Probationary workers in each agency are who do the job after the ones doing it now are gone:

    The Trump administration has begun firing hundreds of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) employees, according to the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists (PASS) union, weeks after a fatal mid-air plane collision in Washington DC.

    Several hundreds of the agency's probationary workers - who have generally been in their positions for less than a year - received the news via email late on Friday night, a statement from PASS's head, Alex Spero said.

    It is a part of a cost-cutting drive, driven by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), that aims to drastically cut the federal workforce.
    BBC
  • Wayfarer
    23.5k
    FPPZOW727AGF4YDY3VVYQXF2W4_size-normalized.jpg&w=540

    Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette (pictured) works at the Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan watchdog group focused on reducing bureaucratic waste. He also happens to be blind. So when he criticized Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service in testimony on Capitol Hill last week, Musk unleashed an online attack Hedtler-Gaudette described as “surreal” in its juvenile bigotry.

    First, Musk retweeted a post on X noting that the “blind director of watchdog group funded by George Soros testifies that he does not see widespread evidence of government waste” and added two laughing/crying emojis. The tweet garnered more than 21 million views, and sparked dozens of hateful messages to Hedtler-Gaudette’s account.

    “He couldn’t see s--- … perfect excuse for being unable to perform your job,” one poster said. “The DEI blind guy can’t see fraud. U can’t make up this garbage,” another wrote. One person even called for posters to surface Hedtler-Gaudette’s bank account.

    The episode illustrates how Musk’s unparalleled online reach has given him a powerful tool to attack individuals who criticize DOGE, with one post able to spark hundreds of blistering responses from his followers.

    Last week, he amplified baseless claims about the judge who overturned Trump’s funding freeze on federal grants that named his government employee daughter. Musk has called for the dismissal of journalists who have written about DOGE, calling their actions “possibly criminal.” As he hunts for places to slash the federal bureaucracy, the billionaire has reposted the names and titles of individual government employees, insinuating they should be fired.

    Digital rights experts say the situation has created an unprecedented imbalance in power. Musk’s massive online following, his ownership of a social media platform where he can dictate content moderation rules, and his position heading a government entity with access to private data, give him a unique ability to threaten those who question him and chill dissenting speech.
    Washington Post

    This is becoming a pattern. Musk can dog whistle his 250 million strong following on X to ridicule, shame and belittle anyone who opposes or even questions his and DOGE's activities. And he often spreads outright lies, which of course the hapless victims are defenseless against, particularly when Musk is implicitly backed by The Emperor. As I said earlier on (but deleted), it's a juggernaut of mendacity (and this time it stays!)
  • Wayfarer
    23.5k
    I’ve been reviewing the news about the mass dismissal of personnel from the Nuclear Security agency, followed by frantic attempts by DOGE to unfuck the situation when they realised they’d just sacked a bunch of people responsible for the US nuclear arsenal. But wait! They can’t be contacted! And why? Because in typical DOGE style, they were all locked out of their email accounts as soon as they were fired. So, like, you know, oopsie.

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/17/climate/trump-nnsa-nuclear-staff-reinstated?cid=ios_app

    In the eventual wisdom of hindsight - which may not be available, because it requires there to be a future - my prediction is that DOGE will come to be seen as the most egregious and idiotic blunder in the history of the government of the United States of America.
  • ssu
    8.9k
    - my prediction is that DOGE will come to be seen as the most egregious and idiotic blunder in the history of the government of the United States of America.Wayfarer
    Well, if you can or will save your Republic.

    It can also seen as the shrewd radical way to dismantle government bureaucracy... as the Trumpists will hope it to be. Who cares that it doesn't go "by the book", Congress is the problem, right?

    Because the way in a Republic, the thing would have gone like this: Trump would have made Elon and the other guy to look through government spending. They would do this for several months. Then they would forward their findings to the President, who then would approach the Congress to change the existing laws and spending by new legislation, that should pass both houses. And this would take time. Far more than the less than a month that now has gone. But this would be the case, if Trump and his followers would want the Republic to operate as the Constitution says.

    But they don't. The don't give a fuck about the Constitution.

    As I've said, the Republicans will embrace the separation of powers, the role of Congress and it's oversight and the fundamental structures of a Republic ONLY if they lose the Presidency. Yet otherwise they are totally happy in turning the President to the role of a Caesar. It's really remarkable as how it's playing out in the US compared to the history of Rome turning from the Republic to an autocracy. (Of course you simply cannot talk about Caeser or Augustus in the same level as Trump)

    Yet the rules in a Republic sould be same for everybody, which ultimately shows that Trump-Republicans have absolutely no respect for the Constitution of for what a Republic stands for.

    Every American who doesn't understand that the country is in a Constitutional crisis is either ignorant or simply doesn't care at all about their own Constitution.
  • philosch
    29
    Having never gone through any kind of vetting or Congressional scrutiny let alone approval. With no published mandate or actual warrant. Deleting programs and withholding funds previously approved by Congress. Nothing remotely like it has ever been attempted.Wayfarer

    All I can say here is if the New York Times characterizes Musk's actions as such then it must be true because they have no bias and all their reporting is always truthful and accurate. :lol:

    Try a different article. DOGE has read only access to the payment system. They are only making recommendations. Of course this is counter to what the liberally biased establishment narrative is so it will be glossed over, even if it is a key demarcation of DOGE's power

    https://apnews.com/article/treasury-systems-trump-bessent-doge-musk-08eb241fc60807b5e1c7b35fcdaee245
  • philosch
    29
    Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I'm supportive of all or even any of those recommendations, just that trying to get the real story has become almost impossible and the regular news outlets only report negatively on all things Trump.95% negative coverage. I'm not even a Trump supported per say, just don't like propaganda and agenda driven reporting on either side. Hard to get to the truth here. It's a certainty there is massive waste of tax payer money and wasteful government spending so let's wait and see.
  • ssu
    8.9k
    They are only making recommendations.philosch
    Really? Lol.

    https://wolfstreet.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/US-government-TIC-2024-11-18-share.png

    Just to give ONE example:

    An air traffic controller told the Associated Press that workers affected at the FAA included radar, landing and navigational aid maintenance.

    Spero said messages began arriving after 7 pm on Friday.

    'We are troubled and disappointed by the administration’s decision to fire FAA probationary employees PASS represents without cause nor based on performance or conduct,' he said.

    'Several hundred employees have been impacted with messages being sent from an ‘exec order’ Microsoft email address, not an official .gov email address.'

    One FAA worker alleged he had been targeted because of comments he made about Musk's companies.

    'Before I was fired, the official DOGE Facebook page started harassing me on my personal Facebook account after I criticized Tesla and Twitter,' Charles Spitzer-Stadtlander wrote on LinkedIn, describing how he was fired after midnight on Saturday.

    'Less than a week later, I was fired, despite my position allegedly being exempted due to national security.'

    The dismissals come at a critical time for the FAA, which already faced a shortage of controllers.

    For years, officials have warned that overworked and understaffed air traffic control systems were an accident waiting to happen.

    But you live in your dreamworld of DOGE just making "recomendations".


    I'm not even a Trump supported per say, just don't like propaganda and agenda driven reporting on either side.philosch
    So the media shouldn't report on what Trump is doing by executive orders, not by following things as they are usually are done in a Republic with separation of powers?

    Do notice, that many commentators do agree that there is waste. Here it's really about the method.

    And where do you put the ideas of Canada being the 51st state or the US annexing Greenland, even possibly by force? Or how about the Mar-a-Gaza proposal?
  • philosch
    29
    So the media shouldn't report on what Trump is doing by executive orders, not by following things as they are usually are done in a Republic with separation of powers?ssu

    So I said I didn't like agenda driven propaganda from media on either side and you think I said the media shouldn't report on what Trump is doing by executive orders? You are demonstrating the problem which I'm pointing at. How is it possible that all of Joe Biden's executive orders were wonderful and all of Trump's are evil? I would much rather have seen 50% of Biden's were good and 50% bad and the same for Trump. I don't really mean necessarily 50, but some reasonable split. But if the news media is 98% democrat the you would expect to see the bias that is present. That's all I'm getting at.

    As for the State of Canada or Greenland or Gaza, I think that is all silliness, I believe he's trolling to get people to soften up for negotiations. I don't like the methodology but am willing to see where those negotiations lead. I'm a registered independent and not really here to defend Trump's politics. I just saw the original quote about the New York Times held out as if it was written by the hand of "god".

    I've taken the time on several occasions to listen to the same news story on CNN and then Fox. It's as if we have two alternate realities. We need someone in the middle, that's what I would truly like to see because neither Fox or CNN or the The New York Times can be trusted. I do not want to see any censorship however, just a news source then can be vetted and shown to be mostly unbiased. I have even checked the sites that report to have charts on which news outlets are the most biased and those sites have a biases that you can see.

    I have no idea if the one example you have shown above is real, if the person writing has an axe to grind, there's no way to vet that story. If I hate Trump and DOGE then it's gotta be true and if I'm MAGA the it's an obvious case of Trump derangement. I'm neither, so I'm left to ponder if it's true or not, just let's say I'm highly suspicious that even if there's some truth there that the way it's presented is skewed. Take the following quote;

    Before I was fired, the official DOGE Facebook page started harassing me on my personal Facebook account after I criticized Tesla and Twitter

    This quote in particular I would love to see proof of this. A decent reporter would follow up on this hyperbolic claim by a source and vet it. They'd want to see the actual harassment from the official DOGE web site and that would be a start. But instead they simple report this as if no proof was necessary. They do say "alleged" as a CYA but then make no attempt to verify because why would they? What if they did and found out the dude was full of BS, they would lose the story and we can't have that, because it's already supposed that DOGE and Musk are DR. Evil and his minions. Do you imagine for one second that if they had actual proof that this guy was harassed by the Official DOGE website that they wouldn't have provided it?Come on man! Then they would not have had to say "alleged". It's sloppy or lazy at best, deliberate propagandizing at worst.

    However in the spirit of having an open mind I'll accept proof of that claim. Prove it. Let's see what constitutes official web page harassment. If that story get's a real vetting I'll by it. But until then it's just another member of the echo chamber, that is the current media establishment, spouting off

    I'm skeptical because of just the way you tried to suggest I don't think reporters should report on executive orders from Trump when I said no such thing.

    As someone who tries to stay open minded in the middle I have found more and more I have no where to go to get decently reported news.
  • Paine
    2.7k
    As someone who tries to stay open minded in the middle I have found more and more I have no where to go to get decently reported news.philosch

    Do you believe the reports concerning the Mass Firing of Federal Employees?

    How about the Closure of Federal Agencies without the approval of Congress?

    Here is report on Probationary Workers by Business Insider. Ironically, much of the information in the report comes from OPM, one of the agencies subject to the order.
  • ssu
    8.9k
    How is it possible that all of Joe Biden's executive orders were wonderful and all of Trump's are evil?philosch
    Presidents giving executive orders simply shows their lack of capability to put through actual legislation.

    No, I do notice the pro-democrat bias. That has been for a long time, yet it simply doesn't matter so much if you take just a little bit of time to look at things yourself. Best way is simply to read the actual speeches of the politicians, not the commentary of journalists what the politician said. In the time of internet, that isn't so hard to do. I've always been skeptic when some party is called "fascist" or "extreme-right". The true extreme-right cannot hide itself. Even the populist comes in many levels and how they respect laws and norms of a republic differs.

    As for the State of Canada or Greenland or Gaza, I think that is all silliness, I believe he's trolling to get people to soften up for negotiations.philosch
    Many try to desperately promote this view, but I think it's wrong. Trump really means what he says. Once you look at his actions from this viewpoint, it actually makes sense. Likely he won't go so far to order a military operation against Denmark, but likely Denmark won't give a message that it's ready defend it's territory even by military means. Denmark is just desperately hoping that Trump will move on and forget the whole idea (just as Panama hopes). That got Denmark off the hook last time.

    But have any journalist ask Trump about his aspirations about Greenland, and he will, until the last day of his presidency, say that it's on the table and the means to get Greenland are open too. He won't back down.

    Or just look at what Trump wanted for Ukraine to sign to:

    (Meduza) The agreement proposed by Donald Trump’s administration granting the U.S. access to Ukraine’s natural resources would give Washington control over the country’s mineral and oil and gas reserves, ports, and unspecified “other infrastructure,” The Telegraph reported, citing a draft of the contract.

    The Trump administration is seeking 50 percent of Ukraine’s current revenues from resource extraction, as well as half the value of “all new [resource extraction] licenses issued to third parties.” Such revenues would be subject to a lien in favor of the U.S. “That clause means ‘pay us first, and then feed your children,’” The Telegraph quoted a source close to the negotiations as saying.

    The agreement also states that “for all future licenses, the U.S. will have a right of first refusal for the purchase of exportable minerals.”

    The Telegraph notes that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky proposed granting the U.S. access to Ukraine’s resources back in September, hoping to attract American investment that would make another Russian invasion more difficult. Some of Ukraine’s mineral deposits lie near the front lines in the east or in Russian-occupied territory.

    “He probably did not expect to be confronted with terms normally imposed on aggressor states defeated in war,” The Telegraph wrote. “They are worse than the financial penalties imposed on Germany and Japan after their defeat in 1945. […] If this draft were accepted, Trump’s demands would amount to a higher share of Ukrainian GDP than reparations imposed on Germany at the Versailles Treaty.”

    Zelenskyi refused the paper, especially not being given any kind of security assurances. So there's your ally in Trump. But perhaps this should be reported more favorably and more positively for Trump.
  • philosch
    29
    Do I believe federal workers have lost their jobs due to Trump, certainly. I'm a federal contractor and work with Federal workers.

    But I don't just "believe" those articles. For instance "the closure of federal agencies without congressional approval" OMG the world is coming to an end. The articles that link don't point to a single agency that's actually been closed and primarily focus on one that the white house or Trump will close in an action that doesn't require congressional approval (see below) Musk has done the review and given Trump the recommendation. In addition, Trump has the authority.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_reorganization_authority#:~:text=It%20permits%20the%20president%20to,presidents%20on%2016%20separate%20occasions.

    Fact 1. DOGE has no power other than recommendation, all the power is Trump's
    Fact 2. For most of the agencies in question they won't be shutdown. The few that might be are well within Trump's authority to do so without congressional approval.
    Fact 3. No agency has been dissolved as of this writing.

    I've been looking at the following bias charts and find them helpful or enlightening rather but as pointed out in this article even they can't be relied upon in every case. It's up to the individual to do as much looking as they can.

    https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/media-literacy/2021/should-you-trust-media-bias-charts/

    Do I know if USAID should be shut down or in this case absorbed into the State Department, not sure. I'd like to read a dispassionate and centrist article on it. It clearly has issues and does a lot of good. Maybe the good it does could be done more efficiently by State. Maybe there is a ton of fraud going to countries bilking the US tax payer and maybe that's right wing propaganda. The mainstream articles are so full of obvious bias that's laced all through their articles in the form of doomsday like rhetoric, I have no real idea whether USAID on balance is decent agency or a waste of huge sums of money.

    My original objection was blindly believing whatever comes out of the NY Times as gospel. Looks like Reuters and the AP are decent but on any given story better do your own research if the Title of the article itself is hyperbolic. That basically guarantees the article is one-sided emotionally hyped propaganda. Doesn't mean there won't be a fact or two, just means you are not getting the whole story, you are getting an agenda driven perspective.

    Here's and ABC example article;
    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/elon-musks-government-dismantling-fight-stop/story?id=118576033

    Instead of just reporting on the facts of the DOGE entity trying to reign in government waste, you get lines like the following pulled from the article;

    "DOGE employees, many of whom have no government experience, have been going through data systems, shutting down DEI programs and in some cases, whole agencies"

    Problem with this sentence. The "no government experience" line is meaningless for starters and is implying the auditors are not competent by inference. Then the "in some cases whole agencies" and as I've pointed out not only does DOGE no have that power, no agency has been abolished as of today. So the sentence is mostly inaccurate and indefensible. That's ABC news for you.

    You cannot find a positive article about DOGE in the mainstream news media. You won't find a critical article of DOGE on FOX. You know the truth is somewhere in the middle but dammed if I can find one.
  • Wayfarer
    23.5k
    It can also seen as the shrewd radical way to dismantle government bureaucracy.ssu

    Do you think they're dismantling bureaucracy, or dismantling the government? What if Trump's hatred of 'the deep state' is actually just hatred of the state? Does that make Trump an 'enemy of the state'?
  • philosch
    29
    Presidents giving executive orders simply shows their lack of capability to put through actual legislation.ssu

    Sure but that wasn't the point. In the hands of the Dem President they are hailed and in the hands of the Rep President they are ridiculed and despised as authoritarian weapons' according to most news outlets.

    I also disagree that the best way to know what's what is to read speeches. I would think the end result of actions is where you would gain the most insight.

    Many try to desperately promote this view, but I think it's wrong. Trump really means what he says. Once you look at his actions from this viewpoint, it actually makes sense.ssu

    I didn't say he didn't mean it. It's precisely that he does mean it that it works. If you were a poker player you would know this. I'm not desperate to prove anything. All I know is so far in each case he has landed concessions from the parties involved even if it's just to open up talks.


    Okay lets take a quick swipe at this particular quote

    The Trump administration is seeking 50 percent of Ukraine’s current revenues from resource extraction, as well as half the value of “all new [resource extraction] licenses issued to third parties.” Such revenues would be subject to a lien in favor of the U.S. “That clause means ‘pay us first, and then feed your children,’” The Telegraph quoted a source close to the negotiations as saying

    Notice the emotionally charged starving your children clause reference by an un-named source. Because that's what an evil Orange man would do. So would the US government, we go around starving children everywhere. We are the most generous and caring country the world has ever seen. I have no reason to believe the line quoted here, there's no verified source, it could be total BS for all I know. Let's wait to see how the war ends and if now we let the Ukrainian children starve to death after spending hundreds of billions on their defense. It is a ridiculous, unsupported and hyperbolic statement. I'm not doubting we've asked for things back, just in the way it's presented here.
  • philosch
    29
    I think I found a source I like and it's the highest rated on the Ad Fontes chart. USAFacts, my main source going forward.
  • Wayfarer
    23.5k
    The "no government experience" line is meaningless for starters and is implying the auditors are not competent by inference.philosch

    Musk’s team of youngsters, as first reported by WIRED on Sunday, is Akash Bobba, 21, a student at the University of California, Berkeley; Edward Coristine, 19, a student at Northeastern University in Boston; and Ethan Shaotran, 22, who said in September he was a senior at Harvard.

    The ones who actually have degrees, or at least have left college, are: Luke Farritor, 23, who attended the University of Nebraska without graduating; Gautier Cole Killian, a 24-year-old who attended McGill University; and Gavin Kliger, a 25-year-old who attended Berkeley;

    The group’s relative lack of experience—especially no previous positions in government work—has Democrats crying foul they were granted access to sensitive records while remaining largely in the shadows, away from public scrutiny.

    All six desperately tried to cover their digital tracks recently, almost all of them deleting LinkedIn profiles, X accounts and even Facebook.
    — The Daily Beast

    As for Musk's accountability for his actions, why, he's not even responsible! Just 'an advisor'!

    President Donald Trump and Elon Musk have repeatedly affirmed Musk’s leadership of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But according to a new court filing from the White House, the administrator of DOGE isn’t Elon Musk after all. Who is? No one knows. The White House won’t tell the public, an administration lawyer has reportedly said he had no idea, and even people who work for the US DOGE Service can’t get a straight answer.

    On Monday evening, Joshua Fisher, the director of the White House Office of Administration, claimed Musk wasn’t actually in charge of the so-called department he has championed for months. Fisher issued a sworn statement in a lawsuit brought by the state of New Mexico and 13 other Democratic attorneys general accusing Musk of exercising authority beyond the scope of his role. Rather than serving as the DOGE administrator or an employee of DOGE at all, Fisher said, Musk’s formal role is “senior advisor” to the president with “no greater authority than other senior White House advisors.” This could make Musk’s authority and standing at USDS legally murky—especially as a number of lawsuits embroil the organization’s activities
    Wired
  • philosch
    29
    I'm not really interested int the story here. I'm more concerned with the media's completely negative coverage. 100% all the time. Even if I admit that Trump and Musk may have ulterior motives they would do some things right yes? The coverage is ridiculous. But I'll humor you on one line never mind the fact that the entire story here is all from Wired" magazine which has a clear bias.

    The group’s relative lack of experience...especially no previous positions in government work — The Daily Beast

    Lack of experience looking at books isn't a deal breaker and just what do you think is so different about government work? I keep hearing this..."well they are smart and well educated, maybe whiz kids without much experience but they haveno gov work experience" OMG as if this actually means something. I've been working side by side with government workers doing government work for over 20 years and it's the same color as non-government work, the statement is meant to convey or evoke this reaction and it's meaningless as to ascertain whether or not some one can do a particular job. This is an article written with an agenda to do what exactly it has done for you, namely confirmed your bias. I've seen this kind of rationale put forth over and over. In the confirmation hearings, Senators who have no experience in all kinds of areas pontificating about other people's competencies in regards to this mysteriously very special "government" work.

    I've read some of your other posts on different topics and I very much appreciate your thoughts in other areas. But here you are not demonstrating the same rigor of thought. I'm commenting on bias in the media and I get these articles sent back to me, not as proof of a dispassionately reported story but rather a story about people's opinion as to the competency of other's they know nothing about other than some bio-statistics. I can only assume you're simply trying to convince me that the whole DOGE experiment is bad. It's a completely agenda driven story and you know it is, you're not stupid. You are trying to convince me of something that has little to do with why I responded to this thread, namely the worship at the alter of whatever source confirms our political views. I will stay independent and in the middle as much as I can. Show me a well sourced, balanced story about DOGE, I double dog dare you.
  • Wayfarer
    23.5k
    The coverage is ridiculous.philosch

    Trump/Musk are dismantling the American Government before the world's eyes. And right now, the betrayal of Ukraine has begun.
  • philosch
    29
    Trump/Musk are dismantling the American Government before the world's eyes. And right now, the betrayal of Ukraine has begun.Wayfarer

    Nice troll. Ridiculously hyperbolic nevertheless but a fair attempt to evoke some emotional response. Not interested.
  • Metaphysician Undercover
    13.4k
    Even if I admit that Trump and Musk may have ulterior motives they would do some things right yes? The coverage is ridiculous.philosch

    The problem with this approach is that when things are done right, it's not newsworthy, it's just the way things are expected to be done, so there is no news there, therefore no coverage. When things are done wrongly, there is news there, and so there is coverage.
1910111213Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.