My opinion is trying to find something connected to happiness. This always been the main goal of humanity. — javi2541997
only to resume our never-ending search for yet another wall in which to bang our heads. — synthesis
Heidegger is highly influenced by Kierkegaard. It's worth the effort in reading it. — Xtrix
time temporalizes itself," meaning it emerges and is constructed out of something else. That "something else" is human being, human experience, human needs and interests. — Xtrix
I think he was much more influenced by Nietzsche, who he wrote two volumes about , than kierkegaard, who he only mentioned disparagingly. — Joshs
Keep in mind that Heidegger didn’t want to equate Dasein with anthropos , the ‘ human being ‘ as biological entity. — Joshs
Yes, It emerges and is constructed out of Dasein, but more specifically , it is the structure the the past only existing as what it occurs into and is changed by. — Joshs
As for Nietzsche, he didn't write two volumes, he taught several courses -- and later than Being and Time. — Xtrix
it is the structure the the past only existing as what it occurs into and is changed by.
— Joshs
This isn't very clear, I'm afraid. What does the second "it" refer to? Time or temporality? — Xtrix
These were published as 2 two volume books of 200 pages each. — Joshs
who he wrote two volumes about , — Joshs
Past , present and future are the same moment, what Heidegger calls the three ecstasies of the ‘ now’, — Joshs
I can't find a single time he "disparages" Kierkegaard. — Xtrix
I think this happens because humans tend to be so stubborn in all painful things or issues. It is quite a paradox right? Repeating aspects that hurt us. — javi2541997
The pertinacity of dialectic, which draws its motivation from a very definite source, is docu- mented most clearly in Kierkegaard. In the properly philosophical aspect of his thought, he did not break free from Hegel. His later turn to Trendelenburg is only added documentation for how little radical he was in philosophy. He did not realize that Trendelenburg saw Ar- istotle through the lens of Hegel. His reading the Paradox into the New Testament and things Christian was simply negative Hegelianism. — Joshs
This isn't a disparagement. Not even close. — Xtrix
Heidegger had nothing but respect for Kierkegaard, just as he had for Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant, Descartes, and others -- despite the fact they he considers them still within the realm of Greek ontology. — Xtrix
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.