• Grre
    196
    I have been a fan of the contemporary philosopher Thomas Nagel since first reading his paper on Absurdism-regardless of my admiration for Camus, I liked Nagel's re-concpetion of addressing the Absurd with positivity/irony rather than spite. I then read "What is it Like to be a Bat" and fell even in more in love with him, in fact, his paper became the groundwork for my own essays and current-ish project on the problem of fish minds and the inaccessibility of the subjective experience. I also enjoyed what I read of The View from Nowhere and have been working my way through his essay anthology Mortal Questions. For Christmas my boyfriend gave me another of his essay anthologies The Religious Temperament which I have just started working my way through.

    Beyond his ideas and politics, which I have come to find I fully agree with, I enjoy Nagel's dry wit and his straight-forward writing style. I'm curious as to who else has read him, and if so, what are your thoughts? I'm not sure if this should be in the "reading group" section, as I'd be happy to discuss The Religious Temperament with anyone else who has read/willing to read it with me, but even more generally, what do you think about Nagel?
  • khaled
    3.5k
    For Christmas my boyfriend gave me another of his essay anthologies The Religious TemperamentGrre

    Just wanted to say I'm impressed with this relationship

    what do you think about Nagel?Grre

    Though I don't know much about his political view, when it comes to his views about consciousness I find we agree on almost everything
  • Wheatley
    2.3k
    "What is it Like to be a Bat"Grre
    It's literally impossible to know what it is like to be a bat because bats do not have empathy. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/8464/the-blind-spot-of-empathy
  • Gnomon
    3.8k
    I'm curious as to who else has read him, and if so, what are your thoughts?Grre
    I recently read Mind & Cosmos, by Thomas Nagel. He rejects the meaningless worldview of reductionist Materialism, and tentatively leans toward the ancient notions of Teleology and Purpose in Evolution. Of course those are taboo topics among most scientists and some philosophers. After reading a dismissive review of the book by a fellow philosopher, I wrote to Nagel to give him my support, FWIW. And to introduce my own personal worldview, which is also teleological and purposeful, although not in the traditional religious sense.
  • TheMadFool
    13.8k
    I used to love being a fan of, as the video game franchise Civlization calls them, great people but then it dawned on me that there's, to my utter dismay, a non-zero probability that I may fan the flames that spell their doom
  • Jonathan Hardy
    12
    Rather than scour the entire thread you attached I would like to request the 'evidence' that a bat cannot feel what others (bats) feel. Do they show the same physical impairment a psychopath has?
  • Grre
    196


    I will look at that thread, but seeing as subjectivity is an area in which I have been spending the last year or so casually studying I'm not sure how you can absolutely state that. Even if you attempt to examine "empathy" from a physicalism/reductionist standpoint, science is still not sure exactly what area of the brain such feeling (the ability to imagine the circumstances of others) would come from, and then how that translates to other brains different than ours...even the concept that fish don't feel pain has been majorly disputed despite fish lacking the same brain structure as we do...they feel pain, just via a different structure. Empathy is such a subjective trait that heavily varies cross-culturally we are not sure how it would even translate into the mentality of other creatures, so how can you say that? Also the entire point of "What it is Like to Be A Bat" discusses the limitations of our empathetic imaginations, we cannot ever fully feel what it is like to be something or someone else....


    I agree, but even our current understanding of psychopathy is sketchy at best, especially given the infinitely variable environmental factors that typically lead to it...
  • Grre
    196

    I've never read that book! Looks like I will have to check it out.
    If you don't mind me asking did Nagel reply? I was considering writing him to thank him for inspiring my project on subjectivity.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.