• Relativist
    2.7k

    You didn't answer the question. You referred to entrapment.
  • Relativist
    2.7k

    "Mueller is the current face of a protection racket. To protect "business as usual"."
    Do you have any facts that support your claim?

    What about the many indictments? Are they fiction?

    I can understand why you might like Trump's policies, but I cannot understand why anyone would have such faith in his character that you can't even conceive of the possibility he did something wrong. I, for one, don't assume he's personally guilty of a crime - and won't until (and unless) facts support it.
  • frank
    16k
    Is Finland racist?raza

    No one knows. Are you having fun, raza? :sparkle:
  • Erik
    605
    @Benkei@ssu

    Thanks for the thoughtful replies, guys. Valuable input on the perception of the US from European perspective(s). Lots to think about...
  • raza
    704
    I did answer the question. It just happened to not be your answer, that the dnc was not behind the trump jr/Russian journalist meeting.
  • raza
    704
    Then I have no idea why you used Finland and racist in the same short post.
  • raza
    704
    What about the many indictments? Are they fiction?Relativist

    Indictments are indictments. What they say are neither fiction or truth.
  • frank
    16k
    Then I have no idea why you used Finland and racist in the same short post.raza
    That's because you have a nodule in your medulla.
  • raza
    704
    that you can't even conceive of the possibility he did something wrongRelativist

    Wrong with regard to what? Everyone has done something wrong whether caught out or not.
  • raza
    704
    And you have your head in your arse.

    Opinions welcome.
  • frank
    16k
    A house divided against itself beats two in the bush.
  • Michael
    15.8k
    Everyone has done something wrong whether caught out or not.raza

    Except Hillary and Obama. They’re blameless.
  • Jeremiah
    1.5k
    All you do is talk about Trump.
  • raza
    704
    All you do is talk about Trump.Jeremiah

    So my response to that would mean I would be talking about Trump, yeah?

    You are quite weird.
  • raza
    704
    All you do is talk about Trump.Jeremiah

    These are the first 3 sentences of this entire discussion thread.

    "I'm clueless. What would motivate Trump to try to squash Comey's investigation? Apparently Trump thinks he committed some offense, but what?"

    What name stands out most, you think?
  • Jeremiah
    1.5k


    You talk about Trump A LOT. I checked your posting history.
  • raza
    704
    You talk about Trump A LOT. I checked your posting history.Jeremiah

    And? Your point?
  • Jeremiah
    1.5k


    Русский Тролль говорит, что
  • raza
    704
    Русский Тролль говорит, чтоJeremiah

    Maybe I'm not a Russian troll but just straight Russian.
  • Relativist
    2.7k

    What facts support your claim? Is it just faith in the virtues of all things Trump, and faith in the evil nature of all things Democrat?
  • Jeremiah
    1.5k
    Probably just the talking points laid out by his employer.
  • Relativist
    2.7k

    "Relativist: that you can't even conceive of the possibility he did something wrong"


    raza: "Wrong with regard to what? Everyone has done something wrong whether caught out or not."


    1. With regard to the law (prime importance)
    2. With regard to ethics (not all unethical activities are illegal).
  • raza
    704
    1. With regard to the law (prime importance)Relativist

    Which law? If it is of “prime importance” then you would need to state which law.

    Was he speeding?
  • Baden
    16.4k
    So my response to that would mean I would be talking about Trump, yeah?raza

    You're not the only one who talks too much about Trump. Many of us do. But it's odd that you came here apparently exclusively to promote Trump. You don't appear to have any other function. I think that's what @Jeremiah's talking about. (But I'm not going to comment on the Russian cyber-troll accusation, which is just speculation.)
  • raza
    704
    “But it's odd that you came here apparently exclusively to promote Trump”

    You highlight what is the difference between an indictment of someone and of whether that means that someone is guilty.

    There is evidence that I have commented on other topics.

    Now you also say “talks too much about Trump”. There are two ongoing threads on Trump. Many have contributed to them. And I started neither of them.

    My advice is do not start a thread if you don’t want responses.

    So commenting on threads others start is odd?

    How odd.
  • Baden
    16.4k


    The vast majority of your overall posts are about Trump and the Mueller investigation and on Trump's side. So, your almost-exclusive function here is to promote Trump. That doesn't make you guilty of anything. It's just an observation.
  • raza
    704


    I reply to responses. Therefore I attempt to maintain the dialog asked of me by others. You are doing that right now. Weird eh?
  • raza
    704
    Check put benkai’s comment box.
  • raza
    704
    “Check out”
  • raza
    704
    Anyone ever heard of the goings on called McCarthyism?

    I think there is a touch of that virus here.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.