• Banno
    2.7k
    It's not been played here before, but I was reminded of it by recent thread.

    Rule one: it's your turn to add a rule.
  • Posty McPostface
    3.5k
    Rule #2. Whereof one cannot speak things must be shown.

    Pictures, please.
  • Banno
    2.7k
    Rule #3
    socialContract1.png
  • Metaphysician Undercover
    3.9k

    Fuck you, and your childish, insidious games.
    I overthrow the game, then I rule.
  • tim wood
    692
    Rule #4. Anyone who uses or refers to rule #4 must start their post with, "Rule #4 is an excellent rule."
  • Cavacava
    2.4k
    'Rule 4' and any other such rules that contradicts previous rules..Rule 2...are invalid, Rule 4

    19100074.jpg

    Rule 5, choose a side
  • Michael
    6.5k
    Rule #6: Banno will learn to post discussions in the correct category, else I'll delete them rather than just move them.
  • Cavacava
    2.4k
    That can be a rule about the thread, but it can't be a rule in the game :B
  • Benkei
    1.3k
    Rule #7, rule #8 shall be typed with your pinkie, on a phone, with autocorrect disabled and no use of backspace.
  • Michael
    6.5k
    Rule #8: Cavacava will not question my authoritah.
  • Hanover
    3.6k
    My rule is sexually abhorrent. Let me know if you're interested in hearing it.
  • T Clark
    3k
    Rule #2. Whereof one cannot speak things must be shown.

    Pictures, please.
    Posty McPostface

    Interpretation request - PMP - does this mean that we shouldn't be using words at all and that all rules should be expressed visually?
  • Janus
    5.2k
    Rule 10: (Had been Rule 9 but Banno beat me to the post) The author of this thread shall reveal the "curious implications" prior to any player stating any further rules. He shall also reveal all the consequences of any of the rules already established being broken. (If rules are broken along the way does this entail that the game first annihilates and then reincarnates itself over and over?)
  • T Clark
    3k
    Rule 9: The author of this thread shall reveal the "curious implications" prior to any player stating any further rules. He shall also reveal all the consequences of any of the rules already established being broken. (If rules are broken along the way does this entail that the game first annihilates and then reincarnates itself over and over?)Janus

    I got rule 9 in first. this is rule 10.
  • Janus
    5.2k


    Banno got rule 9 in first. A previously unwritten and still unnumbered rule says that if you want to state any rule (other than this one: there can be only one unwritten, unnumbered rule...oh, wait, that's another one...damn!) and especially if you want to claim its status as a numbered rule, then you must state that it is so at the time of stating the rule itself.
  • Noble Dust
    2.9k


    Rule 1 and rule 10 are at odds; now I’m paralyzed by uncertainty. Do I post a rule or no?
  • Janus
    5.2k


    No one can stop you, but if you do a rule will be broken which may lead to chaos... (perhaps the "curious implications" have already been implicitly revealed (is there such a thing as implicit revelation???)) >:)
  • Noble Dust
    2.9k


    Rule #11: Not all rules apply at the same time.
  • Janus
    5.2k


    That's very liberating!
  • ssu
    457
    Rule #12: Rule #12 is abiding and cannot be overruled, changed or amended by any later given rule or by referring to any earlier rules.

    Supreme+law+of+the+land!.jpg
    (Noble Dust was quick...)
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.