My theory of the physical mind is like theories of all living systems a chaos theory.

Can we build up a philosophy of an abstract being as basis of existing? What would be an ‘abstract' being? Something immaterial?

First let me introduce my definition of the term ‘Intuition.’ According to my experience intuition is the basic way getting new knowledge or experience. It is based on existing knowledge and/or experience that is governed by a process I call, inherent or internal to an individual’s own interpreting way, ‘logic.’ This process leads to new knowledge and/or experience. This term ‘inherent or internal logic’ replaces the old term ‘subconsciousness.’

In physics there are presently only two entities existing that are not massive: Light and gravitons. According to physics they are not existing without massive entities, means elementary non-mediating particles. Photons and gravitons are called mediate particles because they depict the interacting entities of the basic physical theories electromagnetism and gravitation.

a) The Complexity of the Mind


The idea that the consciousness is an entity based on a bunch of interacting light rays or waves is challenging. What would be the consciousness then?

I have defined the term ‘intuition’ above. I have declared the inherent, internal process of logical conclusion as being the process replacing subconsciousness. The process of logical conclusion is abstract. But what does it mean ‘abstract?’ In a deterministic Universe it would mean that it is so fast and non-linear that it cannot be grasped by the human being.

But what it would look like if the Universe is not based on determinism? What is free will? I would tend to think that free will exist, but it is restricted. That means the Universe would not be deterministic? Well, not necessarily, since it is not clear what an extreme non-linear existence would reflect.

‘Non-linear’ basically means that the prognosis of a natural process, meaning the evolution of Nature is measurable only up to a specific time frame, and only up to a certain probability. As an example we might looking at the weather ‘forecast.’ The weather can only be determined up to a certain level of probability which is sometimes good and sometimes simply wrong and is restricted to a limited time frame. The equations that describe the weather can be written down, but they are highly non-linear. And it can be shown they don’t have solutions that can predict in general the weather forever. When meteorologists try to make a forecast they use computers and these entities are restricted in determining a solution of the non-linear equations.

That can be regarded as a hint to a proof that the Universe isn’t a computer or computer solution. The evolution of Universe will be a chaotic ‘process’ like the weather and chaos theories in general are non-linear by definition. A non-linear trajectory in the abstract space of a chaos theory splits off into two or maybe more trajectories in a point of culmination of ‘interaction’ of the entities involved in the evolution of the functional called ‘life’ in the most abstract form of Nature’s evolution.

The two or more trajectories represent the possible ways that the mind can follow. The positions and momentums of all photons and gravitons build up the abstract space of the brain-life. It is called phase space. Its dimension is 12N, where N is the number of all photons and gravitons and the twelve stands for the three spatial and three momentum degrees of freedom for each photon and graviton. Degrees of freedom are the three dimensions of coordinate space and the three dimensions of momentum space for each photon and graviton. The split off characterises the point of ‘logical awareness’ of what would be the solution, the new knowledge.

As a practical example we examine the weather forecast: In a weather forecast this new knowledge is the actual, meaning present, state of the weather. As an example meteorologists would talk for example a storm. They cannot predict where a storm is created and where it will head. They can only say there’s a probability that a storm would build up and they can, up to a probability, say where it could move on etc. The split off of a trajectory can then be the logical awareness at this point for example that a storm will build up or not etc. And if a storm builds up then we are aware, at the culmination point, it exists since we can observe it then. And the logic behind this is the scientific law that allowed it to come into existence.

A similar process takes place in the decision making within the brain. If it is the electromagnetic field, meaning the light waves that interact with themselves and the non-mediative elementary particles, the latter being the currents made of electrons and ions in the brain. Scientists can measure waves in the brain, but they are far away from being able to interpret them properly.

b) Extremal Complexity: The Potential of attracting the most challenging and sophisticated Brains

Decisions based on the grade of complexity are resulting in individual, high sensitive and fine graded judgements.

Like the rainforest who supports a larger variety of species and plants and is based on a huge complexity of life, the individual brain which is made of an immense complex structure leads to high sensitive and extremely adjusted judgements.

The four-dimensional derivative of a complex, means not easy to comprehend, Faraday tensor leads to a highly differentiated current in the brain. A highly differentiated four-current is being able to adjust extremely good to exterior conditions. If your brain is being able to adjust that way it will be able to make the most accurate judgments about society. Accurate judgements are leading to broad long term agreements within society. Such designs are attracting people.

Why are brains of highest complexity being able to concentrate attraction of many people? The chaotic equation of the brain determines the functional with the most economic decision, means the decision with the most stable attractor of all. The variation of the functional fixes the individual trajectory of the class of trajectories that extracts the most meaningful pattern of the brain. The most meaningful pattern of a brain represents the most meaningful attractor and thus the most meaningful answer to a given problem. This attractor reflects the most logical, the most economic way to achieve a common goal of society. The variation process extracts the most stable attractor against any external distortion. Any external distraction is leading, by the process of thinking, to a new attractor that is the result of new extended consciousness based on a brain which has expanded its knowledge and experiences.

The pattern of the new attractor is the abstract answer to a given problem. It is highly sensitive but also the most economic state of the brain and thus also the most meaningful answer to a problem. The pattern of the new state of the mind is associated with the newest most economic state of the brain. The best economic trajectory is the one which incorporate the smallest set of external conditions. The brain of an individual with a trajectory that respects only the most basic conditions of society is the most favourable by the rational, logical global mind of society.

Considering a given set of external conditions to society the most meaningful decision, means the best decision is based on the result of the decision process of the brain with the highest complexity. The brain with the highest complexity is such a brain that attracts the highest majority of people living in the society in the long term.

The brain’s decision is based on the set of all external conditions and the minimum set of restrictions. The resulting attractor of the given functional, describing the individual’s brain, is the solution to the given problem. This defines the abstract ‘free will’ of the brain. The mathematical abstract space is given by the functional which is limited by external conditions which reduce the degrees of freedom. The restrictions determine the boundaries of the variational integral of the life functional. The ‘grade’ of nonlinearity of the brain is determined of the proper power law whose ingredient is the functional describing the individual’s brain. The solution of the problem is given by the brain of the individual who attracts and thus represents the majority of people within the society.

The potential of a brain is given the offered solutions providing the judgements. The usefulness of the brain's attractor is represented by the attraction with respect to other humans, means the number of people within society supporting the solutions.