I didn't take it as a personal criticism. And you are right that some of these mainstream scientists, though in my opinion quite more serious than Chopra, have aspects that could be critiqued, like Dawkins, for instance, who insists that evolution explains everything.

If people get benefit from this, it's good for them. It's not trivial to argue who probably shouldn't be taken seriously. But quality matters too. So, it's dicey.

:up:

:up: