Why are We Back-Peddling on Racial Color-Blindness? "I described it as a conceit for the privileged. The ascendency can afford to ignore race, ethnicity, gender and disability because their race, their gender, their ethnicity and their norms are taken as the default; they are the background against which others may be seen as different. So in claiming to be blind to those differences, the ascendency denies what makes those individuals who they are, and reasserts its dominance."
"Your skin colour, you aboriginality, your gender preferences, your disability, mean nothing to me."
What you don't account for is there isn't always an ascendancy thing going on in all real life settings or societal/social situations. There's plenty of people that fall into any of the various categories you keep mentioning that neither feel like they are privileged or under privileged and with good reason. What you're espousing is a limited view of how all this plays out in the real world. Racial phenotypes, ability status, gender self identification, etc are
parts of who people are but not nearly the whole story; despite what your claim seems to convey.
You and 180 seem to get along marvelously. There's a racial difference. Which of you is the privileged in this setting?