You do not seem to be aware of the global power shifting away from America as a unipolar power, the goal of much of the world in a multipolar world, one more infused with a cooperative nature rather than subjugation — boagie
With each country America took into its fold moving closer, they also placed nuclear warheads on the soil of these countries. — boagie
Each time lying to the Russians they would go no further. — boagie
America's dreams is world domination, — boagie
The BRICS is the other half of the world saying, enough is enough, and drew a line in the sand, that line was Ukraine. — boagie
does that excuse leading Ukraine to war and then having Ukraine sacrifice so many Ukrainian lives for American (elite) perceived interests, on false pretences? — boethius
If you wish to discuss this, give me some indication you know some history, — boagie
Example, what lead up to the invasion of Ukraine, start with the reunification of Germany and go on from there. — boagie
Of course, Russia invaded before the Ukrainian military was able to provide the kind of resistance that would have made a US intervention feasible, which is why the US hung them out to dry in the end. — Tzeentch
Ukraine is being utterly wrecked in every conceivable way. — Tzeentch
Europe threw its economy down the drain, now has a hostile great power on its doorstep while having completely stripped its military, and it has been turned into the world's laughing stock to boot. — Tzeentch
We are far past that point. Zelensky is not moving to negotiate. He even signed a decree to make negotiations with Russia impossible. The absolute fool. — Tzeentch
Obviously the support is achieving the opposite of sound strategy, which is why Ukraine is slowly approaching the edge of the cliff. Quite extraordinary you're unable to see that. — Tzeentch
It's a strategic argument. Neither Ukraine nor Europe benefits from playing into Washington's hand. — Tzeentch
From a moral perspective it is of course repugnant too. — Tzeentch
That happened after the West blocked peace talks. — Tzeentch
It can still continue to resist militarily, unconventionally if need be, to impose a cost on Russia. This gives them leverage in negotiations — Tzeentch
However, continuing to resist without an actual strategy of what that resistance is supposed to accomplish is remarkably foolish. Imposing a cost on Russia is a sound strategy from an American point of view, not from a Ukrainian point of view, since it would incur a much larger cost on Ukraine itself - it would destroy Ukraine. — Tzeentch
Neither Europe nor Ukraine should make themselves complicit in such a strategy. — Tzeentch
I'm not sure what 'provocation accusation' you're talking about, but what Europe should do is pull the plug on military support for Ukraine. Helping another nation exercise their right to self-defense is only rational if it has a chance of succeeding. There is no such chance in the case of the Ukraine war, and thus Europe should not contribute to the illusion that Ukraine can win this war. Stopping the support will hopefully will bring Ukraine to stop sacrificing its people in vain sooner rather than later.
If Ukraine wants to continue throwing its people's lives away, then that's their right. However, Europe should not make itself complicit in such a senseless waste of life. — Tzeentch
Germany is sort of the paradigmatic example of the free rider problem in alliances. — Count Timothy von Icarus
Is there a danger of Trump pulling something like that in the future (as President)?
No! — ssu
Hamas are a bunch of animals and the people who voted them into power aren't much better. — RogueAI
Don't most aspects of Western civilization predate Christianity in some near-Eastern traditions anyway? — AmadeusD
It's best not to paint too broad a picture as there was more pluralistic beliefs in ancient Greece...But yes, it was taken mainly as a matter of course that some deserved power based on birth or fate. — schopenhauer1
Christianity ultimately led to their downfall as their value system (the one which helped with their rise and success) was replaced with another. The Empire couldn't stomach Jesus. :rofl: — BitconnectCarlos
I take it to mean a thread of history running from the Greco-Romans (as ↪ssu pointed out), running through Christendom in the Middle Ages (by way of preservation of these writings and carrying on in the format in a diminished fashion), with a sort of "rebirth" in the Renaissance/Scientific Revolution — schopenhauer1
at the end of the day, two states is the way to go, — schopenhauer1
Pathetic — Merkwurdichliebe
It is pathetic that these sheep continue to double down on it all, despite the fact Coronavirus-2020-hindsight has proven lockdown and vaccine policy to be an absolute disaster. It is a case of too much pride and zero dignity. — Merkwurdichliebe
However, the evidence behind the above warning is strong enough for NBC to publish the story even in an environment of general denialism and white washing of the issue. — boethius
I even wrote to my country's leadership 3 years before the war started explaining that a lack of international leadership (for example rich countries narcissistically only focusing on themselves, and not creating a mobile medical battalion to bring relief to areas experiencing overcapacity) would lead directly to chaos and conflict, most notably in Eastern Europe.
Now imagine if the West also put resources into mobile hospitals during the pandemic to at least be sure to bring basic medical supplies to areas experience a peak.
Even if it wouldn't be all that successful, it's the kind of thing that would bring people together, symbolize our caring for each other. Of course, the danger of this concept is that it may have worked too well and there'd be no need to wait for vaccines.
My proposal was rejected and I was informed the pandemic was in the hands of the experts, not to worry my pretty little head basically.
Exactly the process I described took place.
Now you may argue my mobile hospital concept would not have prevented the war in Ukraine, but I also explained in my letter that the insular attitude, essentially ignoring international diplomacy, would also contribute to the same.
Again, experts are handling it.
But are they? Are they really? — boethius
So, if you want to live in the real world — boethius
However, now Ukraine seems to be essentially a police state, political parties banned, critical media banned, lot's of disappearing and murdering by the police state. — boethius
It’s so imbalanced in this forum these aspects of Palestinian responsibility have to be discussed and not seen only on one dimension of “occupied/occupier”. If you went to a forum that had completely the other side, you may feel the same… — schopenhauer1
Now, the Nazis in Ukraine are also a legitimate security threat — boethius
These are facts. A just war theory would need to navigate these facts and demonstrate that the separatists deserved to be attacked and shell (Ukraine's war on the separatists had just cause) — boethius
as well as the Nazis are a threat but not "enough" of a threat for Russia to justify preemptive war. — boethius
If Ukrainian Nazis are murdering and intimidating for political purposes in Ukraine, that wouldn't worry you? — boethius
You'd have to be a moron to not have any fear of reprisal if you make peace and radical Nazi groups and affiliates disapprove of that, going so far as to murder a negotiator (negotiating on your behalf, you trust enough to send to talk to the Russians) to make the point. You'd have to be a moron to take at face value the reason for the murder was the negotiator was a traitor without evidence.
Now, if you really think Zelensky is that much of a clueless moron, feel free to state it clearly. Even I give Zelensky more credit. — boethius
If people can murder their political opponents as well as agents of the state without consequence that will influence things. — boethius
Once you achieve enough military power that the state no longer applies to law to you (law enforcement are either on your side or too afraid to do anything), you are one step away from taking power. — boethius
Again, read the articles. If you just ignore the evidence presented that Ukraine Nazis are unaccountable and act with impunity, or then believe people with that kind of power can't affect people's decisions — boethius
This is a paraphrase of the Nazi apologist position, here and elsewhere. If it's not quite exact, then feel free to interpret as Russia has the same Nazi problem as Ukraine. The main point in pushing the symmetry even to the extreme, is how would it matter? — boethius
How does Russian Naziism, assuming it's as rampant as Ukrainian, justify supporting Ukrainian Nazis? — boethius
My position is Zelensky is not a Nazi but that Nazis at this point basically control everything that matters in Ukraine, such as the police state. So it's a slight distance away from a Nazi coup. — boethius
Because we're not talking in some timeless vacuum of eternal abstract concepts.
In 2022, before the war, there were strong Nazi battalions that could act with impunity and unaccountability already, but they were small compared to the electorate and the regular Ukrainian army, so they did not have the power to stage a coup.
From 2014 to 2022 the Nazis main affect on history is keeping the war in the Donbas going, shelling civilians and being generally provocative, and frustrating any peace process. I would categorize them as a danger to Ukrainian democracy and clearly an obstacle to peace.
But they did not have the power before the war to just stage a violent coup.
Now, since the war, they grow exceptionally more powerful within the Ukrainian state but, more importantly, Ukrainian regulars are being destroyed.
If the process continues, at some point (which could exist even now) there would be no way for the Ukrainian state to resist a violent coup. — boethius
A slippery slope fallacy requires an end-point that is either absurd or the proposer of the alleged fallacy anyways rejects. — boethius
It is an important factor to consider. — boethius
For example, if Nazis now have enough military and police power to simply take over the state, then they could leverage that to keep the war going to essentially extort the West. Obviously an actual Nazi coup in Ukraine would be a PR disaster for all the politicians and officials who have championed the war, so hardliners in Ukraine can hold that over NATO and to keep the money and the arms flowing.
Which would be my guess that they'd use their power for (and even if it's not clear they could take over, the threat needs to be considered) at this stage in the war.
As I say, it's a problem. Nazis aren't the only actor in Ukraine and in the conflict, but they are a significant force with their own agenda and have means to try to bring it about. — boethius
Point is, that there is an actual Nazi problem in Ukraine makes the propaganda work of motivating Russians to support the war far easier, even if you personally believe, and is critical to understanding the war and critical to take into account in understanding Western policy.
For example, if you're the US and actually want a war between Russia and Ukraine you would do nothing to stop the arming, funding and training of Nazis in Ukraine, and if your own country passes a law to make that illegal you just ignore that. — boethius
partial control over as well as free rein to terrorize to affect political decisions and processes, is worrisome. — boethius
another reason is certainly fear of reprisal from the Nazis — boethius
Second, Nazis are able to influence the political process with violence instead of electoral success. — boethius
Third, the Nazis are powerful enough in Ukraine that they can commit clear acts of terrorism and face no consequences. They may not totally control the state, but they act with "impunity", so one step away of taking control of the state. — boethius
Since we know Ukrainian politics is affected by various Nazi projects through the threat of violence, we have to consider the possibility different more legitimate political actors are influenced by violent extortion. — boethius
and polls are not only manipulative as we've seen but people can be intimidated to give one answer over another, — boethius
make the case that Russia is basically a Nazi regime too!! — boethius
just that saying the whole regime in Kiev is Nazi is a ever so slight exaggeration Russian propaganda has made. — boethius
If there's a literal Nazi coup, which is not out of the cards — boethius
Which is why I stated specifically we should go easy on this group during the first year. Give them a year to get their shit together. If they don't, then that's their responsibility and not mine. — Tzeentch
No one gave a fuck about healthy people who did not want to take vaccines - at no point during the hysteria were their concerns taken seriously, so I don't buy any allusions to community.
It was 'us vs. them', and healthy people were on the receiving end of it. — Tzeentch
There was no community. — Tzeentch
Yes. Vaccines are there for people who feel unsafe to protect them. This is how vaccines have always functioned. It's a personal choice. — Tzeentch
The vaccines weren't designed to stop the spread. That story used to be perpetuated by politicians who tried to guilt trip their citizens into taking a vaccine that they didn't trust. — Tzeentch
No, of course not. Normal, healthy people didn't have anything to fear from covid. — Tzeentch
The decision to take a vaccine is bound to a human right of bodily autonomy.
To me, that means something. If that means nothing to you, then I have nothing to say to you. — Tzeentch
Also, the idea that not taking the vaccine somehow turned one into a health hazard is completely made up. — Tzeentch
Ill-equipped in the sense that it allowed mass hysteria to take hold for several years. — Tzeentch
It's simply obvious fact that the Nazi groups that rose to positions of power and prominence — boethius
Because it's only the Nazis willing to shell civilians and keep the conflict going in the Donbas come what may! — boethius
What people want to inject into their bodies is none of my business (and what I inject into mine should be none of theirs, but alas the latter was not self-explanatory during covid...) — Tzeentch
Also, at what point do the people who voluntarily partake in unhealthy lifestyles get to take responsibility? — Tzeentch
The health care sector simply isn't organized like this. Usually made up of either private enterprises or controlled by municipal authorities there doesn't exist a centralized command that a nation would need. — ssu
What is Israel's end goal here? Are they planning an occupation? That would imply some sort of rebuilding effort. — RogueAI
To be a sovereign state that can exist without its next-door neighbor threatening its women and babies with rape and mutilation. :grin: — Merkwurdichliebe
First you and anyone reading this notice the goal posts moving from " some 'generalized Ukrainian' that fights on the front" to just Ukrainians in general. — boethius
But as for the poll itself, there is a whole science on how polls can be manipulated. — boethius
let's also ignore the fact alternative views to the government have been criminalized and critical media and opposition parties banned. — boethius
The first question is manipulative as it presumes Ukraine can win — boethius
The second question is likewise manipulative as it adds "as soon as possible", even if you are in favour of a negotiated settlement to terminate the war you may not be in favour of "as soon as possible" which sounds like simply capitulating. — boethius
Not that Ukrainians (even with completely free and critical press and elections unbanned and legitimate non-manipulative polling questions) believing they should continue fighting would form a valid justification, but anyone interested in how the Western media deploys the cry-baby logic of "waaaah, stop asking for justifications and 'reasons' for things, Ukrainians want to fight!" it starts with a transparently manipulative poll to skew the results, in an environment where critical media is banned and skepticism about the war can get you killed, and also the government lying to their population regularly with constant fabricated propaganda (from ghost of Kiev to assuring people the Ukrainian military can and will win and casualties are low and so on). — boethius
Having someone act as a front is fraud and a crime. — boethius
In transferring the asset's nominal owner, Zelensky is trying to obfuscate the real ownership and control of the asset, a crime in itself, and obviously for the purposes of further money laundering. — boethius
Obfuscating the real owner of an asset is a crime. — boethius
The above, along with the offshore assets and accounts, are absolutely cut and dry, perfectly clear, smoking gun, caught red handed, indisputable proof of corruption. — boethius
In this case, the war represents significant economic risks to Ukrainian citizens: jobs, homes, infrastructure, savings, everything. — boethius
and they obviously knew that offering the funds in this way would be a significant moral hazard to Ukrainian decision makers forming a conflict of interest with their constituents (i.e. a bribe). — boethius
So if I post the evidence, you'll agree the claim should be presumed true? — boethius
They don't provide convenient totals, but the main support is the EU (82.7 billion financial aid and 2.4 billion humanitarian aid) and the US (46.6 billion in military aid, 26.4 billion in financial aid and 3.9 billion in humanitarian aid) and Germany (18.9 billion in military aid, 1.4 billion in financial aid and 2.7 billion in humanitarian aid).
The sub-totals of the top 3 donors are thus:
- 110.5 billion USD in financial aid
- 65.5 in military aid — boethius
A draftee is by definition not a voluntary occupation, moreso if you are banned from even leaving the country. If you're argument is that "they volunteered in their hearts" ... I guess we'll have to wait until after the war. — boethius
Well apparently you need evidence that someone caught with offshore accounts and accepting a bribe through his wife deserves every possible suspension of belief when new allegations of corruption turn up. To myself and non-corrupt people you only get one chance to not-be-corrupt, and it doesn't really matter how much additional corruption you do — boethius
Maybe the yacht story will prove true, maybe not, maybe just forgotten in the annals of the internet, — boethius
A justification would not only need to start with establishing Ukrainian just cause (actually demonstrate Ukraine's attack on the separatists is justified) — boethius
but then need to further demonstrate that the course of action is worthwhile: aka. that Ukraine can make military gains that are worth the blood paid and that course of action is better than the alternatives. — boethius
If Ukraine cannot win (as in has an exceedingly low chance of winning), then it is not ethical to send men (and women now too apparently) to their deaths for a cause that has essentially no chance of succeeding. — boethius
But it remains your point, so if it's important you should therefore provide evidence that most Ukrainians on the front choose to be there voluntarily. — boethius
If Ukraine can win ... how? — boethius
Again, it's your claim that there's some "generalized Ukrainian" that fights on the front with the same simplistic cry-baby logic as you and your fellows here as well as Zelensky. — boethius
Echarmion claims Ukraine's just cause is obvious, requiring no evidence nor argumentation — boethius
Not only making a claim with zero evidence — boethius
hen simply refuses to believe even Reuters has a proper understanding of the offer, equivocating on the meaning of "ceasing military operations" — boethius
While we're discussing this, the lead negotiator of Ukraine does an interview where he confirms exactly what everyone understood at the time and more! Saying the only point of relevance was neutrality — boethius
"We cleaned up all the nonsense about "denazification", "demilitarisation", the Russian language and so on. We noted there that Ukraine was not ready to join NATO in exchange for tough and clear security guarantees. A framework for the agreement was prepared.
But then the delegations simply could not move further. We say, guys, the issue of Crimea and Donbas is about territorial status. No one here is authorised to even talk about it. Let the presidents meet and decide where to go. We need a meeting between the leaders", said one of the sources on Bankova.
Transferring an asset in a fraudulent way to avoid accountability is already in itself money laundering. — boethius
I don't personally need more evidence that Zelensky is corrupt and knows that the proposal of sending hundreds of billions of dollars Ukraine's way he can take a little off the top. — boethius
and that is a what corporate people call a "moral hazard". — boethius
The story about the yachts has actual evidence provided — boethius
So again, when the West offers Zelensky billions of dollars structured as a slush fund without any traceability to do their policy rather than accept a negotiated settlement (or even continue to negotiate "just in case" but rather repudiate entirely negotiations), it is not only a de facto bribe but the West knows Zelensky is "a player" who "does business" that way. — boethius
Before the war Ukraine had 250 000 soldiers about and then once the war starts mobilizes over 800 000 total soldiers. The majority of these are not volunteers. — boethius
You do not need supporting evidence for this. — boethius
If papers show up purporting to show 75 Million yacht purchases that's credible until proven otherwise as far as I'm concerned. — boethius
But only because I don't like corrupt politicians and money launderers. — boethius
The bad argument without evidence is the idea that there needs be no justification for the war, no justification for Europe and NATO's financing and arming of the war, because "Ukrainians want to fight", an argument that has appeared numerous times in this forum. — boethius
You're incarnation is to rebut the fact that simply supporting a war without any theory of victory is cry-baby logic ... Ukrainians on the front aren't cry-babies and want to fight! — boethius
This is the position that has zero evidence. You provide zero evidence that most Ukrainians fighting want to fight and the law banning Ukrainians from leaving the country was totally unnecessary and superfluous because Ukrainians want to fight! at least for the most part, so there wouldn't a problem with recruitment. — boethius
The only reason I rebutted your claim that Ukrainians want to fight for Zelensky's various cry-baby statements, is because I honestly don't think it's true. — boethius
A-ha. So when western sources state something you dislike they can also be hand-waved as propaganda?
Seymour Hersh - a propagandist too I assume?
Noam Chomsky - a propagandist, obviously.
Ray McGovern - propagandist. — Tzeentch
What dishonesty and propaganda are you talking about?
People like Mearsheimer and Sachs are dishonest or Kremlin propagandists to you? — Tzeentch