:up:https://jacobinmag.com/2020/04/coronavirus-capitalism-disasters-socialism-economic-collapse
Implicit in the above: it's not a troglodyte question of: 'is state intervention good or bad?', but 'what state intervention, to what ends, for whose benefit?'. — StreetlightX
There are good reasons now not to go to the hospital so that at least your last moments can be with your family. — Benkei
↪Baden What's with the logarithmic scale? (technically that scale would flatten any curve i think). — VagabondSpectre
Of course it’s true that not going outside will reduce the “paths of transmission”. I would argue that you’re not so much reducing a path of transmission as you are storing it for later, but the point is taken.
I’ve been following the case of Sweden intently due to its different approach. The chief epidemiologist, Anders Wallensten said people will eventually ignore stay-at-home orders if they are too stringent, so it's better to adopt measures that can be sustained over a long period of time. Another epidemiologist who earlier criticized the UK’s lockdown approach, Anders Tegnell, said that they are only pushing the problem ahead of them, merely kicking the can down the road so to speak. He also said that mass unemployment and a ruined economy brings with it its own public health problems.
Do you disagree with them? — NOS4A2
You two are talking teleology now. I don't think Darwin or Spenser could support that. — Monitor
is simply Darwinism in action, weeding out the weak and inferior. — Merkwurdichliebe
simply Darwinism — Merkwurdichliebe
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.