ucarr
180 Proof
This seems to me ontologically backwards – existence (encompassed presence (fluctuating)) presupposes reality (un-encompassed absence (vacuum)), in so far as (re: Spinoza ... Democritus-Epicurus ... Nagarjuna) the latter corresponds to necessity (~R = contradiction) and the former to contingency (~E(x) =/= contradiction). :chin:Existence, being the larger realm, houses reality, the smaller realm. — ucarr
kindred
Existence and reality are distinct realms — ucarr
J
Existence and reality are distinct realms. Existence, being the larger realm, houses reality, the smaller realm. — ucarr
reality is an interpretation of physics by living organisms. The label for the
interpretation is reality. Physical things exist. Living organisms and their experiences vis-á-vis physics are real. — ucarr
ucarr
Why can’t they be the same thing ? — kindred
ucarr
Do you intend the various statements to be truth-apt? — J
J
it matters whether or not real things and existent things are distinct — ucarr
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.