• Banno
    23.4k
    94832226_2846118908798176_2966489247982288896_n.png?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=4j8qeCOVDnwAX_W5Gra&_nc_ht=scontent.fcbr2-1.fna&oh=31dbec6eca5356d72b805f818d747bd2&oe=5EC75ECA

    Is this accurate? Can you place yourself on it? (I can't).
  • Pfhorrest
    4.6k
    I consider myself a pragmatist and instrumentalist and consequently a direct (not “naive”) realist. This diagram has problems.
  • jgill
    3.6k
    Best to just do the science and not be concerned with the philosophy.
  • 180 Proof
    14.1k
    (deleted post)
  • unenlightened
    8.8k
    Is this accurate?Banno

    It doesn't have any axes - so it doesn't have any scale, so it doesn't even count as a mental map. Is philosophy of science like religion or politics, a spectrum of dogmatic beliefs and positions?

    What position would be required to judge the accuracy? Would such a judgement be scientific, philosophical? It has all the validity of a facebook what kind of cooking utensil are you? post.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.