• Robert Lockhart
    170
    Terrapin Station: Your recent post in this thread - I've only just noticed it - that as an atheist you don't think our situation could in principle be described as logicaly descended from some unknown primal cause but that nonetheless you simultaineously do think it might result from 'natural causes' : This enigmatic view strikes me as a particular example of impenetrable confusion - unless that is, alone among men, you are aware of a species of relation existing between phenomena unrelated to 'cause-and-effect'. (Love to be informed on this super-human insight). Talk about ilogical and, 'laughing out loud'? Well - "'tis the season to be merry" and - your attempts at point-scoring have certainly succeeded in creating some mirth! Once again - Merry Xmas! :)
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.