now the science says we will be ready to open May 1st — ArguingWAristotleTiff
My beef: we responsibly shut down our economy based on the science and now the science says we will be ready to open May 1st BUT our Mayor disagrees with the same science and said there are other things to consider. What other things? — ArguingWAristotleTiff
Senior WHO epidemiologists warned despite the hopes governments across the world have piled on antibody tests, there is no proof those who have been infected cannot be infected again.
What science do you mean? Opening up everything on May 1st would be a self-destructive move in terms of the virus unless you have a proper system of tracking and tracing plus masks for everyone plus continued social distancing etc. — Baden
Otherwise, you'll just go back to square one and have to face closing down again for exactly the same reasons you originally did. — Baden
The sad part is as you indicated that even when you do open up, the economy will still be screwed apart from online retailers, distance services, and the like. I mean even apart from the problems you mentioned, no person in their right mind is going to go rushing to a ball game or a bar in the middle of a pandemic just because Trump or some other equally stupid official says its OK. — Baden
I know it is for the betterment of the greater good but I just don't know how we are going to fare. We are making arrangements to backstop one of our indians whose job came to a halt and is in Phase 4 of reopening. I have to hand it to the younger generation of being flexible and adapting to new ideas in this new world but it's not my first rodeo, house fire or major tragedy and my bones aren't as resilient as they once were.The northeast definitely needed lockdown. The rest of us? It's hard to say what would have happened with a more limited approach. — frank
No, I think he has done as best he could with what he knew at the time. I don't for a minute think it was a death toll risk ratio for him as in a way of delaying any steps leading up to the shut down. In fact it has been a comfort to know that our current President has been our advocate through these past four years. What I do think is the WHO and science has to allow the exchange of information as promised but not delivered accurate, timely nor willingly. That is inexcusable and we need to look at how we want to go forward armed with the knowledge we will have in hindsight.Do you think Trump lost ground due to this? — frank
Now if the whole virus doesn't produce immunity, it's hard to see how a vaccine would work, and we might just have to get used to a lot of people dying a lot younger and being ill a lot oftener. But I wouldn't be in a great rush to welcome that situation — unenlightened
It’s crazy to think about. Many of us might be without homes within the year. I suspect that within the decade historians will look back and say we took the wrong approach. Best of luck. — NOS4A2
I especially liked this at the end: How do you see science changing after the pandemic?
We’re reporting on how research and researchers’ lives may be permanently changed by the coronavirus. In what ways do think things will be different in the years ahead?
Reading your words turned my stomach back to 2008 when we lost our health insurance because it was that or the mortgage. We lost that margin and never recovered it. My parents are watching their lifetime investments decimated and I have no idea when I will see either of them. My only blessing is that my Dad (biological) passed away before this because isolation would have taken his life and he would have had to passed alone.
Hardly a comfort but trust me it is...
I suspect that within the decade historians will look back and say we took the wrong approach. — NOS4A2
My feeling is if you feel slated as at risk then please stay home. If you feel vulnerable but aren't sick, stay at home. If you feel as though you are contributing by staying at home, please stay home. — ArguingWAristotleTiff
In any scenario, the economy will be badly affected.
Umm.... surely the architecht, the person responsible of the path the Sweden is positive about it. And Swedes like him btw.Here’s an interview in Nature with epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, who remains positive about the Swedish case. — NOS4A2
Personally I think the modelling approach to prediction took a big hit during this pandemic. Even as educated guesses they were way off, but were nonetheless used to guide public policy. I bet we’ll see a new generation of climate change deniers and conspiracy theorists because of it. I think the opposite will be said of research and the medical profession. — NOS4A2
I’m really sorry about your father. I suppose that is a comfort. My grandmother passed away peacefully last week. She didn’t get sick from the virus and has been in palliative care since January, but I wasn’t allowed see her. There can be no funeral, no wake, no nothing. — NOS4A2
My own business has dried up so much that I’m living on my savings. I’m not sure how long that can last. — NOS4A2
The basic choice seems to be between contributing to the health of people or the health of the economy. This has to be, at least largely, a false dilemma. In any scenario, the economy will be badly affected. Who knows, maybe it would have been more harshly affected without the measures that have been taken. There could have been massive labor strikes and associated public unrest, an overtaxed healthcare system, and so on. The economy seemed ripe for a downturn anyway. — praxis
I have to agree with this. The bottom line is that we have to adjust to a way of living which limits the spread of the virus sufficiently that it can be kept under control. I think the economy can be kept running as well, but the necessary adjustments are not easy for communities to adopt sufficiently. Each country seems to have imposed a lockdown when this equation was not going to be possible to sustain. The quicker communities adjust, the quicker they can go back to work.
The adjustment looks like a regime of widespread testing and contact tracing, social distancing measures where people remain at least 2m apart. Wear masks, possibly gloves in certain circumstances and sanitise or wash their hands regularly when in public places. Bars and restaurants will have to have customers widely spaced and take care not to let the virus get into their kitchens, or behind the bar. Unfortunately large mass gatherings are going to have to wait longer before we can return to these due — Punshhh
We are willing to follow the guidelines and ultimately it is going to come down to trust which is what it has always been. Do we trust the people who are cooking our food? Do we trust the Priest who is preaching? Do we trust the Doctors who are treating us? — ArguingWAristotleTiff
Addressing the UN Security Council during a video conference, Mr Beasley said the world had to "act wisely and act fast".
"We could be facing multiple famines of biblical proportions within a short few months," he said. "The truth is we do not have time on our side."
In a call to action, he added: "I do believe that with our expertise and our partnerships, we can bring together the teams and the programmes necessary to make certain the Covid-19 pandemic does not become a human and food crisis catastrophe."
The WFP's senior economist, Arif Husain, said the economic impact of the pandemic was potentially catastrophic for millions "who are already hanging by a thread".
"It is a hammer blow for millions more who can only eat if they earn a wage," he said in a statement.
"Lockdowns and global economic recession have already decimated their nest eggs. It only takes one more shock - like Covid-19 - to push them over the edge. We must collectively act now to mitigate the impact of this global catastrophe."
"Associated public unrest"...huh.....like what? — ArguingWAristotleTiff
Nope.
Georgia 3.7 million.
Ireland 4.9 million.
All the Irish are about to leave COVID country anyway. They may be thick, but they're not stupid. — Baden
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.