• Metaphysician Undercover
    12.4k
    But doesn't the state having a frequency require an "objective" time as a given?Echarmion

    No, that's the point, time is in an uncertainty relation with frequency. Therefore neither of these can be truly "objective". If you designate an "objective" frequency, then the determination of time is subject to whatever this frequency dictates . If you designate an "objective" time. then the determination of frequency will be dictated by this "time". It's an inescapable circle, the one is dependent on the other, but the other is dependent on the one..
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.