As to how, exactly, they give way, you will have to research some of the details of legislative voting on the subject and maybe some of the gun-control groups can help with that. I myself am satisfied that the NRA does a good job on training owners who choose to take the training, but that in terms of laws are a corrupt nightmare.

As ti whether they should give way, you already got your answer: they shouldn't. Now develop that.

Just from the pile of my drek:

https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/2222/ethics-of-care/p1

Hope you might find some theme in that thread that you can exploit.

Argument? There is no argument.

Perhaps this: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/may/10/athlete-shootings-swane-simmons-jaylon-mckenzie-kareem-abdul-jabbar?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR25VXxNr0HycbmI4gz99MlOugCaBDRzquwmIwL2xYoXB2pCAeqMxpDlMAg#Echobox=1557491332

I have an idea that intersectionality, or rather a lack thereof, leads to a continuous system of oppression which in turn leads to more gun crime. — Josiealeese

FYI, any neutral research on this subject (unlike the frequently quoted, NRA-sponsored propaganda) does not find that more guns means less crime. And besides DoJ data, CDC data, and University research (which are all only piecemeal studies), there is almost no source of neutral information in the USA.

I did put a couple of years into formulating answers, and the results suggested a gun violence tax would fix the problem via utilitarian pressure to reduce the tax. So now of course I must be biased. Here is a link to my study.

https://www.yofiel.com/guns/244-916-report

I wrote a sequel, which I sent to John Oliver, and he did a show based on it:

https://www.yofiel.com/guns/243-nra

There is a video of John Oliver's show at the top.