• LD Saunders
    314
    eodnhoj7: No, not all arguments are the same. In fact, it's completely false that we are even addressing an issue that can be decided by an axiom. There is a reason why the issue of whether numbers exist is not resolved by mathematicians themselves --- it's a philosophical question and not a mathematical one. Mathematicians can agree on the existence of a mathematical object by coming up with a definition for the object; however, the issue of whether such a defined object really exists or not is a matter of philosophy, which falls outside of mathematics. That's why it's completely irrelevant to discuss such things as how one can go about determining the sum of interior angles for planar objects by completing a circle of 360 degrees, and knowing a line is at a 180 degree angle. That has absolutely nothing to do with the issue of whether numbers exist.
123456Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.