• Jack Cummins
    5.3k
    I am writing this thread as a response to @
    @180Proof in a discussion of the Buddhist concept of the Middle Way. He queries the relationship between religion and philosophy. I am extremely interested in this relationship and whether religion was central in this, or a later development. I am writing this thread because it seems outside of the scope of the idea of Buddhist ethics.

    Also, I am reading Karen Armstrong's , ' The Great Transformation: The World in the Time of Buddha, Socrates, Confusiaa and Jeremiah', (2006). She looks at the time between 800 and 300 BC in thinking about religious ideas. She also explores of Socrates, Buddha, Confucius and Jeremiah, as aspects of religious beliefs.In.addition, she looks at Karl Jaspers' idea of the axial age in thinking of belief, especially religious belief. The idea of 'God' or 'divinity' encompasses the issue of inner and outer 'reality', subjectivity and objectivity. It also encompasses idea of mythology and story as narrative understanding. This may be opposed to some perspectives of science and objectivity.


    I am of the view that inner as opposed to outer, objective aspects of 'reality' are important here in the tradition of human understanding. Science, similarly to religion may be embedded in mythic understanding. What do you think, especially in relation to the concept of myth?.As far as I see it is a topic involving dialogue between ancient philosophy, as well as anthropological thinking and research. How may the development of ideas about 'gods' or one God be understood in the history of religion and philosophy?.
  • Barkon
    164
    Isn't religion, educational things (including philosophy) put in practical use considering the nature of living on this planet? Sure, God is significant in the bible, but the amount of words alongside God outnumber God. God can be considered a creative tool set to enforce the latter, that is, the way to live. Isn't it just an attempt at co-ordinated living given all what we know?
  • tim wood
    9.3k
    How may the development of ideas about 'gods' or one God be understood in the history of religion and philosophy?.Jack Cummins

    I imagine this is the point of your post - is there another? But these seem but different names for the same thing.
  • Jack Cummins
    5.3k

    I am sure that the issue of hows and whys of religious thinking have been explored on so many threads. One major aspect may the psychology of religion, and why do people seek to attribute so much to gods or God?

    Of course, it could be turned around, as into the question of whether psychological aspects are a question of higher metaphysics? I see it as very complex, but I am probably someone who overthinks. This relates back to your query about 'names' for the same thing', because it may be a matter of language and framing in human explanations.
  • Jack Cummins
    5.3k

    The concept of 'God' or ''gods' is interesting. It is worth considering to what extent it represents 'a higher reality' as such, or a tool in human understanding? This may be an issue which spans psychology and anthropology, as well as philosophy. It may go back to core basics of metaphysics, and how these are constructed by human beings.
  • Jack Cummins
    5.3k
    The question, or issue, may also be about what is an explanation, which may be answered so differently. It could come down to a 'supernatural deity', a material cause or some kind of psychological intermediate. Historical origins may be important but it may also be about origins in terms of causes, or how these are understood, involving both logical explanations and metaphors or symbolic dimensions of thinking.
  • Nils Loc
    1.4k
    Science, similarly to religion may be embedded in mythic understanding. What do you think, especially in relation to the concept of myth?Jack Cummins

    For Joseph Campbell, myth was somewhat like the educational operating code for integrating folks into their culture. He had used the metaphor of a womb often to refer to cultural providence/support structures. The stereotypes we value, the stories we tell about those types, help to guide the development of persons to be functional members of society. I think Campbell conceived of the informational global age as producing a kind of wasteland of shattered or diminished cultures which poses new adaptive challenges to individuals trying to make their way in world.

    Ideology is likely a good stand in for the word myth. Do we need ideologies to live healthy lives? Which ones ought we to accept and embrace?
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.