• NotAristotle
    340
    One of the main takeaways from this discussion, for me, is that while some formal arguments may be valid, they are not necessarily valid in an informal setting.

    To wit,

    B
    Therefore A→B
    Formally valid.

    Water was added to the lake.
    Therefore,
    If it is cloudy out, then water was added to the lake.
    Informally not valid.

    as well as -

    A ^ B
    Therefore, (A→B).
    Formally valid.

    Kangaroos are marsupials and Paris is the capital of France.
    Therefore,
    If kangaroos are marsupials, then Paris is the capital of France.
    Informally not valid.
  • Moliere
    4.7k
    Hawt damn. Looks like it was worth all the posts after all :D
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.