-
Tarskian
599For Jews:
Mosaic law ⊢ isMoral(behavior)
For Muslims:
Islamic law ⊢ isMoral(behavior)
As far as I know, everyone else does not have enough of a documented shared understanding to be able to define an isMoral(behavior) predicate.
In that case, if you put 5 people around the table, you will end up with 12 different conclusions. It is simply impossible that they will agree on anything. Everything will be up in the air with maximum confusion.
Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.
Categories
- Guest category
- The Lounge
- General Philosophy
- Metaphysics & Epistemology
- Philosophy of Mind
- Ethics
- Political Philosophy
- Philosophy of Art
- Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Language
- Interesting Stuff
- Politics and Current Affairs
- Humanities and Social Sciences
- Science and Technology
- Non-English Discussion
- German Discussion
- Spanish Discussion
- Learning Centre
- Resources
- Books and Papers
- Reading groups
- Questions
- Guest Speakers
- David Pearce
- Massimo Pigliucci
- Debates
- Debate Proposals
- Debate Discussion
- Feedback
- Article submissions
- Help
More Discussions
- Justification: Casual inference vs witness testimony - 5 million USD in Prize-Money
- Coach Sean McDermott's 9/11 reference. Any justification?
- Hegel: Idealistic justification of phrenology?
- Reality does not make mistakes and that is why we strive for meaning. A justification for Meaning.
- Briefly on common existential justification
- Other sites we like
- Social media
- Terms of Service
- Sign In
- Created with PlushForums
- © 2024 The Philosophy Forum