• frank
    14.6k
    I agree.Moliere

    ha
  • Moliere
    4.1k
    A joke, yes, but with a point -- it's true we understand one another in this conversation, I believe.

    Given the indeterminacy of translation, how do we understand one another?

    My answer is we're not translating. (there's also something about gavagai that's not right as an example -- it focuses too much on mereology and less on usage)
  • frank
    14.6k
    A joke, yes, but with a point -- it's true we understand one another in this conversation, I believe.

    Given the indeterminacy of translation, how do we understand one another?
    Moliere

    I guess Quine would have us deflate "understand."

    Like this:

  • Moliere
    4.1k
    But that wouldn't explain why we both got the joke.
  • frank
    14.6k
    But that wouldn't explain why we both got the joke.Moliere

    I think maybe Quine isn't your cuppa tea. :razz:
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.