• 180 Proof
    14.1k
    Alrighty. :up:
    Well according to my parsimonious 'two types', I cop to philosophical naturalism (i.e. prioritizing ontological immanence over ontological non-immanence) in my praxes.
  • Janus
    15.5k
    :lol: Appropriate clip!

    :up: If I have a tendency any way it would be that way...I certainly don't believe in or prepare for an after life.
  • Paine
    2k
    This is an interesting approach since I have problems with classification.

    I agree with Deleuze when he treats some concepts as created things. When one uses them as a point of departure, the thought is some of them and some of the one using it. That is a different activity from each of us expressing ourselves as well as we can with the words we can share as given starting points.

    That is why I put effort into wrestling with 'primary' text. I want to have what is said to be mine, but I recognize when the feeling is not mutual.
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.