• KantDane21
    47
    My logic is very rusty, I have given it a shot below, but not sure if it is correct. feedback appreciated!

    "Either all cognition is cognition of appearance, in which case there can be no cognition of noumena, or there can be cognition of the noumenon, in which case cognition is not essentially cognition of appearance"

    P- all cognition is of appearance.
    Q- cognition of noumenon.

    P ā‹ Q
    Pā†’ -Q
    Qā†’ -P
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement ā€” just fascinating conversations.