• KantDane21
    47
    what does it mean if something is a fortiori possible?
    and if something is not a fortiori possible?
    I see the later as meaning simply that something may not be the case (in the future).
    e.g., Tomorrow it will snow is not a fortiori possible.
    Reading a paper on contingency and necessity...it has got me slightly confused...
  • universeness
    6.3k
    The following from:
    https://www.gotquestions.org/a-priori-posteriori-fortiori.html
    may help:

    A much less-commonly used term, a fortiori, describes something related to a priori knowledge but not exactly the same. The term a fortiori means “from the stronger,” and it refers to arguments that seek to prove a “smaller” point by appealing to an already-proven “larger” point. For instance, if a man says he can afford to spend $100, we assume he can afford to spend $10. If drinking one sip of a liquid is fatal, we assume drinking an entire cup is also fatal. If a man can hold his breath underwater for three minutes, we assume he’s able to hold his breath for one minute. If it’s considered a sin to punch someone, we assume stabbing him would also be sinful.

    When we argue a specific point based on some larger or broader established idea, we are using a fortiori arguments. In common dialogue, we often use phrases such as “even more so” or “all the more.” This is, in general terms, an appeal to a fortiori logic, and the examples given might all be framed using that kind of language.

    Technically speaking, a fortiori arguments are not ironclad to the same extent as truly a priori statements. In the prior examples, if the man in question had been given a signed check for $100 by a friend, he might only be able to spend exactly $100. In other words, it’s logically possible that he can “afford” to spend $100, but not $10, since he has no other money. So, while a fortiori arguments are reasonable, they are not logically absolute, so they are not truly a priori


    So based on the examples given:
    If a man can afford to spend $100 then we assume he can afford to spend $10 is a fortiori possible.
    If a man can afford to spend $100 then it is not 'a fortiori' possible that he can afford to spend greater than $100
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.