• Daniel Waller
    6
    Hi everyone, does anyone know what the solutions to these questions would be? I am really struggling with this particular piece of homework, so would appreciate any help or explanations. I have to prove that the following statements are valid in proven logic. Thank you :)
    ¬ = not → = if/ then
    ¬ ¬(P & Q) : ¬ ¬ (Q & P) (6)
    ¬ P → ¬Q: Q → P (6)
    : (P →Q) → (¬Q →¬P) (5) Principle of transposition
    Q → R : (¬Q →¬P) →(P →R) (9)
    (P & Q) →¬R : R →(P →¬Q) (11)
    P: [(¬(Q → R) →¬P)] →[( ¬R →¬Q)] (9)
    P, ¬Q: ¬ (P →Q) (6)
    P, ¬P : Q (8)
    : ¬P → (P →Q) (10) Law of Dun Scotus
    P → ¬P : ¬P (11)
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.