Is this quote true ?
There was a comment regarding logic a while ago
That got my attention
> Be careful with the logic they study in the typical philosophy course.
> They only handle the very primitive beginnings of it. They do not even seem to deal with 19th century Boolean algebra, let alone with serious mathematical logic.
> Using that primitive tool, i.e. just some bits and bobs of Aristotelian logic, you won't get anywhere.
> Without a firm grasp on the work of Gödel, Tarski, Church, and Turing, you won't be aware of the fundamental limitations of first-order logic, especially, when dragging basic number theory (PA) into the fray.
> You will easily overestimate what is possible, simply, because you do not know that it is completely impossible. That is one of the many reasons why the absurd optimism of contemporary philosophy quickly degenerates into mere bullshit.
Wouldn't this comment imply that even logic develops ? And isn't enough to know possibilities