I just published the novel. Really wanted to give credits to famous philosophers but no one gave me good references on this forum. Here is the novel link if someone interested diving into the topic: https://www.amazon.com/World-War-3-1-3rd-ebook/dp/B0927ZPQ1K

"Of course, control can lead to perpetual chaos, the kind that could never be achieved without control " It is interesting that you said that because it is one of the conclusions in my novel.
It is a bit ironic you mention that computer was invented without any competition which is of course quite the opposite because the first functional computer - the Enigma machine was invented during World War 2 to decrypt Nazi communications, since Nazis invented their own machine encrypting messages.

Evolution is chaotic in a sense that "individuals" in evolution freely compete against each other for survival and for the right to continue to live. This process is not controlled by a higher entity. This process is amoral from human's morality point of view as it lets the weak to die.
I am not a major in philosophy and I would love some members on this forum to give me good references from well known philosophers that wrote on this topic. Thank you.

Life is full of meaning. From my childhood atheists pushed idea of endless universe and how tiny Earth was compared to cosmos. While human life was just product of evolution and had no meaning. Well. These days we've got simulation hypothesis which finally can scientifically reverse this trend and make Life full of meaning again.

You might be right. I will take time and try to compile something. I thought videos are actually more engaging than text.

I'm author of "Answers In Simulation" book that tries to answer philosophical questions using the simulation hypothesis as a tool. I'm working on the new material now. As I do my research I also post videos which are related to what I am researching. It is fun!

Thank you for feedback. I talk a lot about God because within the concept of simulation theory it has two meanings: creator of specific simulation or creator of the real world. I am trying to build a proper simulation theory doctrine. So any constructive criticism and feedback are welcome. I needed to give viewer some basics of metaphysics as not all viewers are familiar with the most basic terms. Pantheism is perfect fit for simulation theory because it doesn't see the difference between digital artificial word, physical world and most importantly final God. It is all one which to me is perfect and elegant solution to problem of infinite nested simulations, morality within each of the simulation and so on. Please, understand that I had to keep video very short to get views... I am happy to discuss in detail every point on this forum. Please, explain which philosopher I misinterpreted?

TheMadFool — TheMadFool

Thank you! This is what I was looking for. I was only guessing that it is the case and we can understand anything.

You said "Our minds are specifically structured to mentally process phenomena that are specifically important to human beings and other similar animals. We are probably unable to conceptualize anything that does not fit into that structure."
I think empathy overrides that cause we can imagine ourselves as not humans.

that is back to my monkey point only u used dog example. I think our mind might be different from any animals in principle. Then such logic would not apply.

what about empathy? we can make ourselves feel as other being and not necessarily human.

I am fine with unlimited time

Sorry, I maybe was not clear. Please, understand that I am looking for answer not from technical point of view but philosophical. Simulation theory is not part of my question, this question simply arises a lot within that context. Let me rephrase my question in more abstract form: Can specifically human mind understand the intentions of another abstract mind of unlimited thinking power, given human gets enough time?