From Europe

What are you talking about, I didn't come up with such a hypothesis or such a theory, so I can't take credit for that — whollyrolling

Under "you" I meant most of the atheists :wink:

If according to your hypotheses there are trillions of planets in space, then why, according to your own theory of probability, we have received absolutely no evidence of alien life?
And most atheists are 100% sure that there is no God, than Why intelligent life, only exist on Earth?

Atheism includes no such stipulation. — whollyrolling

if you have time then ask for example people on Facebook in atheist groups - Which of you is 100% sure that there is extraterrestrial life. I guarantee you that the results will surprise you

//Why do atheists ask for evidence of God, when there is clearly no such evidence?//

Why do atheists believe in a extraterrestrial life, when there is clearly no such evidence?

everything will depend on people's fear of the law

How are these kids


Better than these kids



So no need to say that the world is fair and good and honest people live well in it

In history, nations that cease to multiply give away their territory to Nations that multiply, and rarely does it happen peacefully. For Russians, the size of their country looks fair, but it hardly looks fair for China or Indonesia.

Is that fair? After all, someone just lucky to be born healthy and beautiful and also in a rich family with great influence

Indonesia Population: 264 million


Russia Population: 144.5 million


Is it fair?

you have a very good opinion about people.
The world is unfair from the birth of a man to his death. How in an unfair world can there be a long world peace

I asked you a simple question and you do not have an answer to it?

Do you think America will allow the Russians to build their military bases in Mexico or Canada?

I think world peace can be achieved if humans wisely use the intellect and ability for social cohesion we have been gifted; promote different cultures and ways of life, allow free trade and open communication. — Jonmel

Long world peace is only possible when there is one race, one culture and one country in the world.

there were no holy empires in the world, all empires shed their blood during their formation. Therefore it is not necessary to tell that one empire sacred and the second bloody. Blood is on them all. The Roman Empire for the sake of their benefits destroyed entire nations, All the major political figures in human history have hands to the elbow in the blood of the unseen victims.
The world is not divided into black and white, in the world many other colors. So do not judge communism and Stalin only using two colors, white and black, not everything was good but not
everything was bad.
Before condemning communism, read about the conditions under which the majority of the people lived in the Russian Empire. Communism it was the only time in the history of Russia when the majority lived normally.

Аnd it looks like the story will be repeated soon, because rich people have not learned the lessons of history. They did not understand that they had to control their greed. And it is better for them to share wealth with the people on their own terms, than to wait until the hungry and the angry people begin to share their wealth themselves.

I was referring to the flippancy and even the hint of pride with which some talk of "bringing down the white man", and the implication that the globe is oppressed by a white regime while globally whites are a minority. Funny how one can be so subtle in one's vitriol: — whollyrolling

why immigration goes only in one direction, everyone goes to white countries, whites do not really go to Asia or Africa or the Middle East? Race is not only skin color but also in many ways a common culture. All races are good, but the immigration of all the other races to countries where the white race mostly lives and while the birth rate in these countries is waning will cause the white race to mingle with immigrants and disappear while the other races remain to exist

I do have to ask what form of “communism” you’re talking about here? If you mean from Marx and Engels manifesto then, no is the only reasonable response. In an ideal world communism works without flaw, as does practically every other economic system. — I like sushi

The main problems of communism are the slowdown of technological progress, and the reluctance of a small group of people to live as everyone else lives. Those who want to drive the Mercedes when everyone else driving the Ford. The first problem will fall off with Robotization and AI, the second will be solved with a strong hand and cold heart.

I’ll start by making clear to you that Russia won’t join NATO for the simple reason that NATO exists to prevent Russia starting WWIII. If they were to join ... well, you can hopefully figure out how ridiculous that idea is by yourself? — I like sushi

In the Soviet Union and Russia, people believe that NATO will attack them, and NATO believes that this is the Soviet Union and now Russia will attack them

Do you think America will allow the Russians to build their military bases in Mexico or Canada?

Your motive is unclear and so is your question. You seem to be a troll. — whollyrolling

For you the troll is the one who expresses the opposite opinion from yours?

rather were do our sense of right and wrong come from — hachit

Most likely from the habitat in which individuals grow

Do you take yourself to be some kind of prophet? — I like sushi

This is just a history, analysis and logic.

I certainly agree that humanity’s social evolution this century will mean the end of “nations” as we know them today - they are actually quite a recent development! — I like sushi

Such changes do not pass peacefully, there will be resistance, there will be war

Stalin was a worse enemy of the world than Hitler was, no one realized it at the time. He had killed far more people and his only intention during the war was to conquer Eastern Europe as a foothold for further aggression against Europe. Stalin made a pact, an alliance involving sharing Poland 50/50 with Germany. The only reason Russia eventually joined the allied forces was because Hitler was psychotic enough to attack it. — whollyrolling

And what surprises you so much that Stalin and Hitler signed an act. In Europe, all governments disliked the Soviet Union and why did the Soviet Union have to help some of them? And if Hitler had not attacked the Soviet Union, then England would have an end soon and then the history of mankind would have been different.
And you know, for example, that in the USSR people lived worse than residents of socialist Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, the German Democratic Republic, the former Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia. And Soviet Union also gave money to the Cuba and others. Soviet invaders are strange, the invaders live worse than those they captured.

Why is racism if it's true and I'm not talking bad about other races

I'm not talking about a war for ideology, I'm talking about ruthless, psychotic dictatorship. Even at its most egregious, America didn't ruthlessly slaughter people by the 10's of millions. — whollyrolling

And what wars in which the Soviet Union took part were not ideological?

I guess “racism” and “sexism” are old — I like sushi

Sexism will regain strength with the next big war.
And we're just on the verge of big racial wars. Any majority wants to remain a majority. And any minority, wants to become a majority and will do a lot for this. We are on the verge of change, the "white world" is gradually ending

The death count in Europe during WW2 just due to the war effort was at least 20 million — whollyrolling

And what is the fault of communism in the Second World War, except that the socialist Hitler hated it?

There was a war for territory — whollyrolling

And in the Soviet Union there was a war for ideology and why a war for ideology any worse than the war for the Territory, when the strong deprives the weak of his house.

If globalism was allowed to run its natural course then all countries would essentially merge into being one. National identities would slowly be eroded until human civilization would become a mononculture. — Jonmel

For the white race globalism is disastrous, it will disappears as the Neanderthals disappeared.

then I think human progress would stall — Jonmel

Maybe if progress stall its not bad. Progress gives more and more opportunities for humanity to destroy this world

Let's count, how do you get hundreds of million.

And why you think that communists always kill people without reason.

Why Americans essentially destroyed Indians?

how well it worked for the hundreds of millions of their victims. — whollyrolling

I'm just curious how did you get "hundreds of millions of their victims"?

No one intrinsically supersedes borders. — whollyrolling

Internet destroyed borders

On any idea, always there's the opposite idea. What is right and wrong, many perceive in different ways.

For Example Globalism is it good or bad?

A divergence grows between different cultures until there is a conflict of interest. — Jonmel

Culture is the identity of the nation. Identity is always a conflict of interest. Only in a world where all people are the same, there will be fewer conflicts

Capitalists aren't usurping with the exception of money lenders, and even then there's a choice to go into debt or not, and there's a choice to purchase a product or not. Every time anything has gone seriously wrong in the modern world, it's been either communists, socialists or liberals at the forefront. — whollyrolling

This time may be different. Robotization and AI will lead to loss of human work. How can capitalism exist in a society where most of the unemployed, communism is better suited for such a society

Internet is not intrinsically dangerous.Actions of people who seek to harm other people are dangerous. — whollyrolling

With the current laws, you can't punish the bad guys. The bad guys captured the internet.

Brainwashing requires willing participants, whatever is happening under harsh political authority, threat of physical violence or incarceration is not brainwashing. — whollyrolling

Any blogger is brainwashing his-her public.

Brainwashing requires willing participants, whatever is happening under harsh political authority, threat of physical violence or incarceration is not brainwashing — whollyrolling

Any blogger is brainwashing his-her public.

Nationalism is not evil, neither has it come to power. — whollyrolling

Nobody sad is evil

No one is simply "a man from the planet earth" — whollyrolling

A man without roots is a a man from the planet earth. The internet destroys the roots and erases the difference between nationalities, it makes everyone the same

I think there's a small chance it Internet will disappear. I think it will be divided between Allied countries. And it will be more under control and probably not anonymous. Because anonymity is the road to impunity. Government need to control information that people consume. Because any information is a potential role model and behavior training.

Let's take for example legit company like Netflix and some of their movies.
House of cards And not so long ago a watch movie there about Flat Earth theory. And the movie actually very polite to people who believe in flat Earth.

What's in common in those 2 movies?
They both destroy people believe and trust in government.
And then Americans blame Russians, When American companies making Content like this did more harm for the country then Russians.
Maybe it's time to ask Netflix why they're shooting the movies that killing in people trust in government and law.
They do it for profit or .....???
Because they definitely not stupid they understand exactly what they doing.

You didn't understand what I said. The world is changing so fast that people who are over 30 born and lived in another world than there is now. And they compare the old world with the new and many of them dislike the new world.