Comments

  • Man created "God" in the beginning
    "The Tao is what exists as an undivided whole. People break it up into the 10,000 things..."

    Through what agency? If, for example, I am undivided and whole, then who breaks me up into the people who further breaks me up into the 10,000 things?
  • What is the difference between God and Canada?
    God has Doubting Thomas, but we got Stompin' Tom.
  • Wholes Can Lack Properties That Their Parts Have
    To clarify:
    What we quantify is neither brick nor wall nor Earth nor Moon. What we quantify is apparatus.
  • Wholes Can Lack Properties That Their Parts Have

    Huh? It's definitely a property of Earth that it weighs 3kg on a brick, say (because of its mass). And it's definitely a property of the Moon that it weighs 0.5kg on a brick, say (because of it's mass). The property of the brick is mass, the property of the Earth is mass, and the property of the Moon is mass. Weight is a property of our apparatus.
  • Wholes Can Lack Properties That Their Parts Have

    In the original post we used our magic scissors to part a semicircle from a whole circle, and later we used our magic sledgehammer to part a brick from a whole wall.

    What is the whole, and what is the weight of this whole, from which we parted our weightless photon?
  • Wholes Can Lack Properties That Their Parts Have
    Heavy or light makes no difference.

    Quantity is not a property of things, but things are a property of quantity. If there is no thing to quantify then there is no quantity. "Nothing" is no thing, so no quantity.

    It doesn't matter if it's lightness or heaviness or weight or mass or whatever because each is a property which both brick and wall possess to a greater or lesser degree.
  • Wholes Can Lack Properties That Their Parts Have
    Weight is a property of brick, and more weight is a property of more brick.
  • Wholes Can Lack Properties That Their Parts Have
    Your reasoning seems backwards. The semicircle is as much a whole as is the circle, but consists of more parts. The circle consists of two parts; a line, and an equidistant point. The semicircle contains these same parts, and adds two end points which the circle lacks. Similarly, the circle is an essential part of any radius or diameter since without it they're just lines. I think your assertion that the semicircle is a part of the circle is false, and that the whole approach is weird.

Trinity Stooge

Start FollowingSend a Message