Models of Governance I am trying to follow some logical steps from reasoning to conclusion in the sense that the conclusion is unavoidable. But I don't see it in this case.
1. Narrowly applied. I will explain.
I think fairness could be interchange with reasonable. Is it reasonable? And I think it is. Giving the fact that I believe no one is able to get exactly what they want in a group of more than one some sacrifices need to be made.
Now you talk about individual but a country have many of those. So the sacrifice that 1 make is equal to the sacrifice that another make therefore its reasonable/fair.
Example - One didn't negotiate all the rules (I believe non of them did that is a far fech assertion) and the other didn't get the vote to allow a person to be a citizen when he granted one at birth.
2 As for the conclusion. getting their own land. Land cost money. People can live their whole life without being able to do that. But your conclusion is that a person just need to disagree with the government to be allowed to get a piece of land?
I think more reasonable conclusion is that one should be allowed to forfeit his citizenship.
Also you keep on talking about rights but say nothing about obligations.