An easy solution is to guarantee the right to work in the constitution. If you cannot find work, the state will assign you one. You need to look at this perspective from a more analytical one rather than assuming that everyone has their inner individualistic needs which take priority over the monarch (who's right to rule has been given by God). If you cannot understand this and the other policies that made conservatism so successful until the birth of liberal ideas, no wonder you support this false idea of individualism and liberalism.

Rationally speaking, if it looked at from an analytical perspective instead of an objective perspective, Hume's theory comes into mind when speaking about the validity of mind-brain supervenience.

“Palestine is only a geographic expression” - A well known 19th century diplomat

Ivanoici's Vienesse waltz; Danube Waves is quite good to listen to.

Nice to see you defending religion against hedgehog at least

calm down man. Writing an essay for one mere comment certainly says something about you....

I wrote a witty comment which took a long time to craft of that thread, can a mod quote it so I can repost it again?

From this I can assume that you are all atheists? Matthew's gospel is perhaps the most definitive if one would like to research the purpose of life. One should live their life to the best of their ability and then have faith through their actions and belief in the Kingdom of God.

Word of the day: Archduchy

Radetzky March by the Musikkorps of the Nationale Volksarmee Grenztruppen (RDA)

There are a lot of things wrong discussed about this discussion, most importantly the perceived notion of any party in the U.S. being “conservative”

really, an egotist. Worse than a parliamentarian in my opinion.

What is the purpose of philosophy? Why do we exist? All these questions have remained unanswered until now. The answers are reading Hegel.

__________ won the ________ War of ___________.

Mental resilience could improve if you abstained from internet philosophy discussions

A motive that effectively shuts out potential new philosophers. It is amusing that the most active people on here have over 1000 posts. Maybe you should rethink your strategem.

“Religious folk” “dogmatic”. I think you need to look at the log in your own eye before talking about the specks in others. Atheists have a blatant refusal to believe anything about religion, even with obvious historical evidence it is still denied. You simply talk about philosophers and their thoughts but I doubt you have read any of the gospels.

Capitalism has very few ethics, hence ideas like the systems in Hegel's days seemed to have worked ethically. Philosophy is currently a mess due to the ideas of capitalism etc.

The reason for this is simple. A government can list anyone that poses a potential threat to their power in an election as “deficient” and therefore manipulate the whole election in their favour.

Unfortuantely my email was not working for that account.

Glad to be here again.

the sources which you have mentioned don’t seem to link to each other and each has a considerable amount of personal bias towards the “CIS gender” side.

From a Hegelian perspective, I would rationally perceive infinity not as a quantity.