What is? — Vera Mont
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class
Common definitions for the middle class range from the middle fifth of individuals on a nation's income ladder, to everyone but the poorest and wealthiest 20%.
Terminology differs in the United States, where the term middle class describes people who in other countries would be described as working class.
Friedrich Engels saw the category as an intermediate social class between the nobility and the peasantry in late-feudalist society. While the nobility owned much of the countryside, and the peasantry worked it, a new bourgeoisie (literally "town-dwellers") arose around mercantile functions in the city.
No, it was doing fine, as clerics, crafters and army officers. — Vera Mont
And, no, the middle does not disappear; it usually prospers. Gets bigger and smaller, mostly due to the volume of commerce and definition. — Vera Mont
Ah, a conspiracist and an incel. Well, you boys have fun here. — SophistiCat
the middle class dissapears — Linkey
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. — Robert Briffault, The Mothers.
Some authors state that this trend started when Reagan decreased the taxes for the rich. — Linkey
Strong men make good times.
Good times make weak men.
Weak men make bad times.
Bad times make strong men.
IMO those concepts are far too subtle to be introduced the first day of foundations class. — fishfry
religious and spiritual beliefs promote the assumption that the universe is fair — Gnomon
have you run a correlation with happiest countries, and places of violence or war, for example? — jorndoe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Berezina
By 1 p.m. the smaller of the two bridges was complete and Oudinot began to lead his infantry of 7,000 men across the river and establish a defensive position to protect against the Russian forces to the south. Later that afternoon, the larger of the two bridges (for the artillery) was completed, but collapsed twice. Napoleon began to move his force across the Berezina in earnest.
The bridges were then available for the stragglers; however, despite encouragement, most of those who had fought so hard to get across the river during the bombardment chose to light their campfires and spend the night on the east bank. The next morning, the commander of the engineers, General Eblé had Napoleon's order to burn the bridges at 7 a.m. Eblé delayed the execution of that order until 8:30 a.m., at which time, tens of thousands of stragglers and their civilian companions were left behind.
The unfortunate men who had not taken advantage of the night to get away had at the first appearance of dawn rushed on to the bridge, but now it was too late. Preparations were already made to burn it down. Numbers jumped into the water, hoping to swim through the floating bits of ice, but not one reached the shore. I saw them all there in water up to their shoulders, and, overcome by the terrible cold, they all miserably perished.
Cossacks and Wittgenstein's troops closed in upon Studienka and took the stragglers on the east bank as prisoners.
That's surely an issue only for the absurdist philosopher and his next of kin, not for sensible people. — Vera Mont
How do you know? Where is the evidence? — Vera Mont
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy/article/abs/reason-the-universe-exists-is-that-it-caused-itself-to-exist/393019C8CFEBE88DD10347577702AEAD
Philosophers have traditionally responded to the question, ‘why does the universe exist?’, in one of two ways. One response is that ‘the universe exists because God created it’ and the other response is that ‘the universe exists for no reason—its existence is a brute fact’.
And all of this has exactly what relevance to the universe being absurd and meaningless? — Vera Mont
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2024-04-15/study-deaths-of-despair-move-higher-among-blacks-than-whites
The term “deaths of despair” emerged in the public consciousness following a seminal study showing a reversal and yearslong rise in all-cause mortality among middle-aged whites in the U.S that was driven heavily by deaths from suicide, alcohol and drug overdoses.
Now, new findings published in the journal JAMA Psychiatry reflect a significant shift in deaths of despair among middle-aged adults. The study tracked rates of mortality from suicide, alcoholic liver disease and drug overdose from 1999 to 2022 among people 45 to 54 years old. Researchers found that in 2013, the rate of these deaths among whites was approximately double that of Blacks, at 72.15 per 100,000 population compared with 36.24 per 100,000.
But by 2022, the rate of deaths of despair among middle-aged Blacks had nearly tripled to 103.81 per 100,000, topping that of whites at 102.63 per 100,000.
https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2022/february/black-american-nones-faith-unaffiliation-nothing.html
Black Americans See the Biggest Shift Away from Faith
But black “nones” are growing. With 3 in 10 adults in the US claiming no religious affiliation on surveys, the rise of the nones has touched every corner of American society.
Over more than a decade, the share of Black Americans who say that they have no religious affiliation has risen more dramatically than whites, Hispanics, or Asians.
Yet, is rationality truth-apt, as you've defined it? At least if it's epistemologically denoted, then these observational sentences are truth-apt, no? — Shawn
Helping those who can be helped with life by spiritual teaching is fine if it helps. — creativesoul
Hopeless, to you, evidently means not worthy of help. — creativesoul
According to what observable reality? — Vera Mont
If it were possible to extend the import of Gödel's incompleteness theorems on non-formal languages, then what would they be? — Shawn
Rationality is a feature/quality we attribute to a plurality of individual thoughts, beliefs, and/or statements thereof. How well are they strung together. — creativesoul
"The universe is irrational and meaningless" is false on its face. We are elements within the universe. We make rational meaningful claims. The universe is not irrational and meaningless. — creativesoul
Citations? — Harry Hindu
if God is eternal then there was never nothing to begin with — Harry Hindu
If nothing can speak — Harry Hindu
You make a claim without incorporating the other characteristics associated with God, like being eternal. — Harry Hindu
If God exists, then who created the circumstances of your hopelessness in the first place to then look to it for hope? God created childhood cancer, schizophrenia, our bodies that have the capacity to be tortured, etc. I can imagine a more moral universe than the one we live in today — Harry Hindu
Such people cling to hope — Jack Cummins
I, on the other hand, only accept any claim when there is sufficient evidence to support it. — Harry Hindu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
In politics, regulatory capture (also called agency capture) is a form of corruption of authority that occurs when a political entity, policymaker, or regulator is co-opted to serve the commercial, ideological, or political interests of a minor constituency, such as a particular geographic area, industry, profession, or ideological group.
...
Alternatively, it may be better to not create a given agency at all. A captured regulator is often worse than no regulation, because it wields the authority of government.
suicide is not always irrational — creativesoul
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absurdism
Absurdism is the philosophical theory that the universe is irrational and meaningless. It states that trying to find meaning leads people into a conflict with the world. Absurdism claims that existence as a whole is absurd.
Various possible responses to deal with absurdism and its impact have been suggested. The three responses discussed in the traditional absurdist literature are suicide, religious belief in a higher purpose, and rebellion against the absurd.
Stop bullshitting and go solve the equation, insane crank. — Lionino
Laughably pathetic attempt at a character attack. — Lionino
In the real world I do not have to deal with schizoid incompetents with delusions of grandeur like you babbling about things they are two degrees away from studying, no such issues follow. — Lionino
I cannot because the article is from 11 years ago. — Lionino
a crazy individual ... whatever insanity — Lionino
Ignore the schizophrenic above. — Lionino
And so forth. I cannot tell if the form of the argument is valid: if I convert it to truth tables, it is not. And what is meant here by "exist." — tim wood
You are wrong and a news piece is not a reliable source. — Lionino
Press inquiries
Press and Communication Team
Tel.: +49 (0)30 838 731 80
Email: presseatfu-berlindotde
Expert database
Tel.: +49 (0)30 838 731 91
Email: expertiseatfu-berlindotde
Marketing inquiries
Email: marketingatkumdotfu-berlindotde
More nonsense. — Lionino
I suggest you seek basic education so you don't have to abuse random internet links to appear smart. — Lionino
https://www.gurobi.com/resources/open-source-mixed-integer-and-linear-programming-solvers/
Open-Source Performance: Mixed-Integer and Linear Programming Comparisons
Performance is typically a crucial consideration when choosing a solver. To give a sense of the relative performance of the various solver options listed above, we’ve summarized the results of independent benchmark tests maintained by Hans Mittelmann at Arizona State.
If we look at performance on Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) models across a broad set of test models, the table below shows results along two key dimensions: a) was the solver able to solve the model, and b) how quickly was the model solved? As you can see from the results, performance varies widely across solvers.
Which has been the trajectory of moral development over time. But obviously not everywhere. — Tom Storm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect
The Lindy effect (also known as Lindy's Law[1]) is a theorized phenomenon by which the future life expectancy of some non-perishable things, like a technology or an idea, is proportional to their current age. Thus, the Lindy effect proposes the longer a period something has survived to exist or be used in the present, the longer its remaining life expectancy. Longevity implies a resistance to change, obsolescence, or competition, and greater odds of continued existence into the future.[2] Where the Lindy effect applies, mortality rate decreases with time. Mathematically, the Lindy effect corresponds to lifetimes following a Pareto probability distribution.
His proof is not successful — Lionino
https://www.fu-berlin.de/en/presse/informationen/fup/2013/fup_13_308/index.html
Independent Confirmation for Gödel's "Proof" of Existence of God
Scientists at Freie Universität and TU Vienna Use Computers to Check Reasoning of Austrian Mathematician
№ 308/2013 from Oct 17, 2013
Scientists at Freie Universität Berlin and the Vienna University of Technology have succeeded in checking and confirming a so-called “proof of God” by the Austrian mathematician Kurt Gödel (1906-1978). Christoph Benzmüller from the Dahlem Center for Intelligent Systems and his Viennese colleague Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo succeeded, using computer programs, so-called “theorem provers,” in verifying with the highest mathematical precision the logical correctness of Godel’s proof of God. A short preliminary version of this work is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.4526 . The formalization and verification of the proof are online at <a href="https://github.com/FormalTheology/GoedelGod" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/FormalTheology/GoedelGod</a>.
The consistency of the basic assumptions made by Gödel was confirmed by the computer. Furthermore, the scientists were able to demonstrate that the nontrivial proof was, for the most part, able to be generated automatically by the computer. They had not expected that to be the case.
The age-old question of God's existence of course remains unanswered and depends on the meaningfulness and reference to reality of the chosen axioms. Gödel's reasoning, however, in the opinion of the computer scientists has been proven to be correct, as demonstrated by the computer.
I don't think the societal conversation has been increasingly poor or corrupt. But this might be down to the values one holds or how unhappy one is. — Tom Storm
All I am saying is people will have views and talk about 'oughts' and 'ought nots' as a by-product of human community life. The kind of processes or dynamic which might follow are not in scope - I'm simply describing the original impulse. — Tom Storm
Nonsense — Lionino
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_nonsense
In mathematics, abstract nonsense, general abstract nonsense, generalized abstract nonsense, and general nonsense are nonderogatory terms used by mathematicians to describe long, theoretical parts of a proof they skip over when readers are expected to be familiar with them.[1] These terms are mainly used for abstract methods related to category theory and homological algebra. More generally, "abstract nonsense" may refer to a proof that relies on category-theoretic methods, or even to the study of category theory itself.
I don't follow. Sorry. — Tom Storm
IMO, "a non-dualistic viewpoint" doesn't "solve" these logical negations (i.e. "the split"), only denies-ignores them. — 180 Proof
We live together as community and this means holding values. It's impossible not to. Ethics emerges from the resulting conversation just as surely as poo comes from eating. — Tom Storm
both atheism and theism are partial truths — Jack Cummins
So I'm puzzled by those who want to give a proof of God, because they usually are religious people. Why not simply follow the given manuals and act righteously? — ssu