I think you do actually have a problem there with understanding what I am and how that feels - thus you try to make me believe that you know better. As do others who try to dictate to me that a male who - feels - he is a woman does feel what I do.
That is ridicules and very highly offensive to me.
So now I have - as you show no respect towards me being the women I am - reached the point when I have had enough of this sort of offense.

Try saying that to my gay friends - ah but you know you could just as well change your brains and then you would want to have sex with women.
... never heard anything so offensive.

obviously not all females are female thus?

did you actually skip all biology classes? Or do you just pretend you do not know how a child grows in the womb of a woman after that the sperm of a male hit the egg?

of course because my entire being is female with an alien brain what does not fit the rest because some moron put it where it does not belong by some Frankenstein operations.

Your question is quite silly actually... and if you believe that me being who I am is in my brain - think again... my entire body is a proof of it and my entire hormon system too

why do some - SOME - gay men act in ways a normal woman would never ever act?
I do not know... it looks exaggerated and utterly silly to me. And our behavior is something we can control - so if they are not out of control they must act it and play it.

And I might add that my homosexual male friends LIKE MEN...and they know how to distinguish between a male and a female - thus.

but that is a fictive story that has nothing to do with reality - in my mothers womb I evolved - every cell within me to become a woman not a man. My brother who was born 18 moths before me evolved into a male. Every cell in his body. As every cell in mine.
DUE TO THIS
our brains evolved into different sexes - his male with less connection between the two parts and mine into feminine - with more connections between the two parts.
And thus - due to the evolvement of the cells who made us male and female and thus also the difference in brains and hormon systems - we are male and female - and if his brains were to be in my head it would NEVER EVER make my body male.
Ever...
Not in the wildest dreams - because nature is not according to magic - but according to the processes that makes us who we are. We are thus - entirely - all included - formed into being a male OR a female - and if it were not the case - then there would be no idea - CHANGING the sex.
Now would there?

no - no not at all. What you talk about is not at all the issue. Because sex and wanting to have sex is up to everyone - but it is an issue of deep inner identity that is confirmed and reaffirmed exterior - who I am. What I am.

That is in my chromosomes in every part of my being, in all I am.

if you (a cisgender woman) had your brain transplanted into a man's body, would you identify as a man or a woman? — Michael

But being a woman is not an issue of the brain - it is the ENTIRE BEING my complete and total body and all I am and feel --- that is me. Who I am as a complete...

they are, regardless - if they would not be then they would stay male or female

yes I have friends who are homosexuals - and not all who are gay have that sort of behavior --- women do not normally have that sort of acting.

I'm not dictating to you who or what you are, but you are dictating to transgender people who and what they are. — Michael

Really??? So my nature and the fact that I am who I am dictates what really to someone who is a wannabe?

it is the knowledge of that every cell in my body from conception to birth and after during my entire life - I know I am a woman. And I love being that - so a copy of what I am and other women - a lookalike but without the complete structure of what a female is - is not a threat but some sort of mockery of who I am.
It feels like when someone behind your back imitates you for the fun of others who laughs at you. This is what I feel.

before I came into puberty I always - ever - liked men. The feeling towards them is within me completely different - as was my father completely different from my mother and the feelings I had to them were different. I have not - and that is close to revolting for me - imagined having a woman's body in an intimate act with me. So there has never in my life even been curiosity for that because the males are - entirely - attractive for me.
I was born like that and still am and will not change because there is no attraction in a female body for me. At all.

they are talking passed me!!
If someone would steal my identity and pose as if they were me I would drag them to court --- that is identity theft no less no more.
And you see they are not males even when they resemble such a bit, as you see the males who resemble women. I have seen cases that almost looked like a woman- but there is something that is in every cell of our body - so you see it anyway... even when they had hormones when young.

I find that offensive that they want to dictate to me who I am and what I am - that is really really offensive.

are the differences between a biological female and a transsexual irrelevant — T Clark

no - they are at the very depth of who we are it is more than just an identity it is the entire being we are

please do NOT offend me. A vagina is not a cavity like some whatnot made o resemble it - it is a deeply sensible part of my body that I was born with - the resemblance of a penis handmaid by some physician is not a penis in the real sens --- why do you say this?

A copy of an Omega is still not an Omega and that is only a watch not my body - you talk about my most intimate parts like they are nothing... but they are! They are part of who I am and was born to be.

feel that changing the definition of "woman" is disrespectful and risky. — T Clark

you feel? Ask me what I feel when someone who is no woman is trying to annihilate me and who I am and tell me that I do not exist the way I have always seen myself and men - and I like men, because they have what I do lack and that is the entire ball game.
I do not only feel deeply offended by I do not understand what is there in this sort of --- strange discussions

men normally as do a lion and a bull have some equipment between their legs and they normally produce sperm - I have not that sort of equipment nor do I produce sperm - I ovulate and I can bare children as do lionesses and cows bare their offspring ... that is basic biology for me and the difference is due to producing offsprings thus nature has created us such - all except for hermaphroditis ---and other insects that differ from the norm of male and female. What is the point - I do not understand what you are trying to convey...

and the conclusion was when you did that before my entrance in this thread yesterday was?

I do know the difference between a bull and a cow when I see them and thus there is something in the physical appearance that is different - just as a lion and a lioness --. but you do not see that difference? Why?

as is then all sort of feelings and inner experience that you think you have - but are delusions? Or connections you believe exist between events or cause and objects in this world?

the opposite sex to myself

Why are you so opposed to us using the term "woman" to refer to people other than those with XX chromosomes and born with a womb, a vagina, ovaries, etc.? — Michael

Because I being one know they are males

Physical laws" are invariants in the structure of physical models which attempt to explain regularities experimentally observed in the physical world. To the degree such models themselves are objective, the "physical laws" derived from them are objective. — 180 Proof

So that "sort of objectivity" is thus no applicable to the laws of moral? Like do not murder?

I have no problem accepting the difference between the fictive and the real. Never had - but I have met secular people who believe they cannot say if they are in a Matrix or not.

:smile:

And the humans who say that they have a real experience of God - who are they talking about? Fiction or reality?

okay - let us put this then within the realm of no meaning and no goal to anything that exists - it just evolves freely and without meaning of aim. That is in fact the stand of atheism - am I right?

okay, see your point - but I put all he said into play - as a whole and did thus jump one small concept
:wink:

When you say, 'in the end it is will', than you take a turn in the history of philosophy, will is opposed to reason, as Schopenhauer was opposed to Hegel. I do not disagree with you there. However, then the question would be what motivates this 'force of will'. Is it free decision making? That I doubt for the reasons laid out above, but other than that, there are many candidates, will to power, drive, love... — Tobias

And I fully agree with you on this - this is why I said that "initiate and gives the situations its content or opportunity".
I think that sometimes my english fails when I try to convey a thought properly...and now I marked where the emphasis is in that line of thought...

no no no no I am pointing out the correlation between the act of actually going in order to make a win - happen...

yes yes we know all this.
BUT I actually asked you why.
Why do we have these un useful and completely meaningless brains that work for nothing the way they do - no other animals have them.
Do not say I should read phycology and stuff - because they ONLY study what is already present and there - not why it came to be...

I do not understand your line of argument - as there is no line... of argument. If belief does not form how people act - so what do they act on? And if actions do not form and build physical reality - what does?

If you think that it is okey with murder - and you act on it then there will be a dead person in the physical reality and the police in the same physical reality will link you to this murder and will punish you. Don't you think?

who are the criminals?

Don't be shy gentlemen and ladies.

Are the laws of science objective or subjective ...

:smile:
yes - but without any doubt - if and only if - you actually go (an act of will) you have the chance to win or lose - if you do not go (also an act of will) you can never ever never win nor lose.

Read Against Method, re: "context of discovery" in contrast to, or distinct from, the context of justification. — 180 Proof

Well, yes I have read and there is no such thing as what Twain stated at all. Quite the contrary Feyerabends anarchism is not even in a long shot something that will give at hand that he meant that chance is at work. His critique against Lakatos, and his own "dadaism" and "everything goes" is more of he sort that he deems science to be a project more or less the same as myths and that technique is like magic. But not chance...

In his efforts to refute Lakatos (much based on the thoughts of Kuhn whom he also refutes) he views Lakatos as a sort of anarchist an the criteria that should generate scientific programs are almost meaningless - but no chance here...
Feyerabend --- if you find it quote it - has not said what Twain said... as far as I remember.

there are perfect theories within psychology what does exactly explain this issue : Jung Anima Animus... and what happens when the human being is unable to integrate these into his/her psyche. As well as what happens when humans are unable to integrate the shadow into her/him self.

Are the laws of science objective or subjective?

so in short - then atheism is all about repeating what some guru said and no ability to think or find reasons on who or what one in reality is refuting?

Good point there then...

If we apply logic to questions like these - we must ask ourselves if in the last 2000 years - everywhere jews have lived - they always slaughtered others around them?

If they never did that. Why did they suddenly start now if the other part is completely innocent and has not done anything to provoke these actions?

I normally ask myself these questions.