The poor and Capitalism? No, that's actual communism, which never existed. Everything we see today is a degree of socialism.
Socialism requires a high degree of micromanaging of the people by a government system. Usually, this results in starvation, corruption, and brutal violence as seen throughout the world in nations that embraced actual socialism. Removing the property from the "rich" essentially takes away from the working class.
Believe me, I know this. I have a jerk for a boss who is sexist against women and pays me well below the living wage for my area. If government restrictions were actually reduced it would be easier for me to find a decent job because other people of the "rich" class would be willing to hire me. This is the case for my relative area, as I am developing a side business in which I am well paid for the work I do for those who are considered "wealthy." (unfortunately, that all goes to basic living expenses to make up for that which my "job" doesn't pay for) Hence, I support the reduction of taxes and decreasing government handouts towards "poor" people, aka people unwilling to work harder and longer. For those who actually need help, private charities and religious organizations should be given liberty to assist those they deem in need of such help. Thus, those who actually need help would gain it. Again, from my experience, the government's system of assisting those in need is an unflexible wall of red tape. They refuse to help me.