I see plenty of people complimenting themselves here.

So I guess now we'll have raza back? — Akanthinos

I think Martha is very capable of holding her own. Unlike the various sjw tribes, the true intelligencia do not need the form of armies that merely reflect the extent of an sjw’s personal insecurities.

I’m not particular attracted to that one either.

Unless you can provide sum sort of REASONABLE source for this, and the rest of it, I call BS — Sir2u

I only wanted to plant enough for anyone interested enough for themselves to further look into.

There is a lot of evidence for the genuinly interested.

I find it disingenuous when people pose as interested.

Are you aware of Roswell, they residents witnessed a UFO near there — Sir2u

I’m aware the US military conduct testing there. Any UFO is likely to be a result of military tests whether such things as flying objects are the military’s tests of their own actual secretly developed craft or secretly developed holograms. Holigraphic technology is more advanced than you may realize which can be utilised to deceive.

The military complex, just as it is with espionage agents, do play games with citizens involving the creation of enemies that don’t actually exist in real life. ‘Security’ is probably the biggest business there is. The ‘Security business’ doesn’t even have to convince to sell. They just take through taxes.

It means, I think, dim people can be quite happy.

A not particularly bright person can be easily distracted by simply constructed, cheaply produced, models of entertainment. Happy, perhaps, to watch many reruns of Disney films.

It almost looks as though the name “rachMeil” comes from the name “Michael Rectenwald”.

mmmmmm

Yet, we can try to understand what is going on. — Number2018

While breaking out the popcorn.

Although, having now read his tweets in article 2, the “one dude” makes some sensible observations.

What I make of him is just one dude.

The author of the article wants to make this one dude something far greater than just this one dude.

But to bring it back to it’s basic plane, a President should have no policy-implemented control over the media or the speech of any citizen.

If a government makes attempts at de-escalation of a public mania, outright tyranny is only more likely.

In that case, EVERYONE. In other words, the entire spectacle reflects the current state of human consciousness. Human consciousness climbing inevitably towards it’s precipice.

I need to rephrase that opening sentence:

If a “global war” OCCURS during a Trump presidency, such a thing could be invoked by his political opposition

If a “global war” during a Trump presidency such a thing could be invoked by his political opposition.

Just after the 2016 election I had this conversation with a friend at my house to do with riots erupting as a reaction to Trump’s victory by mobs of angry anti-Trumpers where shop fronts were smashed and looting occurred.

He: Those riots show how divisive he is.

Me: So as you and I have a different political opinion and after this conversation you leave feeling pissed off with me about that, on your way down my street you break the windows of a nearby shop and some neighbors houses.

Is you doing those acts a consequence of me “being divisive” or just you being a vandal?

Triggered, not in the least. It just seems to ride on much of what has been suggested already, “collusion, blah blah”, and the trailer along with those typical media types seems pretty cheesy.

I am sure Trump has dealt with a mafia boss here and there from time to time. Those gangs have always and will always get their tentacles into everything.

Those same gangs interplay and do deals with the CIA, FBI, and the rest.

Where I specifically nail my colours to the mast is election collusion fantasies up against US voter preferences.

By the way, what liar did he beat to be where he is?

Testimony under oath:

https://youtu.be/dax8KvfPXPI

Let us not forget the liar he beat in order to be where he is. Testimony under oath:

https://youtu.be/dax8KvfPXPI

I don’t think he is blundering. I just think he does not do the expected “presidential act”.

I think he plays to the mistrust many have in the usual politicians who “act presidential” while being essiantlially criminal behind public scenes.

People generally know presidents and politicians of the past are corrupt.

For all we know, on a scale Trump maybe less so. If he isn’t less so he will want to appear less so.

Also, it appears to be his personality and so if he attempted to sound “presidential” he would not carry it as believable.

re-edit:

.....even if this is not what MAY eventuate, as it depends on what is presented.

In other words, what makes a statement sound reasonable? — Isaac Shmukler

Maybe it is something which is delivered in a calm, therefore reasoned, manner.

It implies to me that a state of reasonableness, even though it may state a specific position, is delivered in such a way that it is inviting of other or opposing viewpoints - and that the person who’s position is being discussed, therefore, appears open to having their mind changed (even if this is not what eventuates, ad it depends on what is presented).

one stops to exist after one is dead — Isaac Shmukler

Something appears to have stopped. What, in fact, however, is that “something”?

I would call that “something” a personality.

Essentially, therefore, a personality disappeared from one’s occasional, or more than occasional, experience.

A particular thing we do not know is what death is, because we are not able to report it.

To summarise: Someone who “dies” has disappeared.

An airline pilot I know of retired once he became aware that planes he flew were installed with this.

His estranged and psychopathic sister is a military-intelligence commander (SES, Senior Executive Service) who is connected to Hillary Clinton (who’s work as a lawyer involved being a patent lawyer), and who both accessed the patent for the BUP (Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot) which was thereafter produced.

Initially the BUP was trialled for transporting dangerous prisoners from Hawaii to mainland America.

That very same airframe, 9M-MRO, a few weeks later (also as a Malaysian airliner), took off from Amsterdam and ended up crashed in the Ukraine.

If this equipment had been installed in every aircraft, don't you think we would have heard about some problem it caused or failed to solve?
Counting that they said it would take a few years to get it into all of the aircraft it would still be a few years ago that they become able to remotely control the planes. It seems sort of strange that the people that pushed to spend all of this money are not rushing to validate their wonderful ideas at every opportunity.
Like wise the ones that opposed the installation would be screaming about the smallest of problems caused by them. — Sir2u

Not if the technology is kept secret for use in nefarious operations.

That missing plane made Jacob Rothschlid over 16 billion dollars. Yep, the Rothschild group.

Are you aware of the military airport of Diego Garcia? Residents of The Maldives witnessed that plane near that base.

That’s politics! That’s the propaganda game.

it is about as “documentary” as fako Michael Wolff’ “tell all” book.

It didn’t take long for him to drop off the radar after he exposed his fraud in that Australian tv interview.

Movie will go the same way, particular after th Mueller thing dries up. It’s merely designed for the midterms and then it will be a zero.

Anyway, I think the worst sort of people are those who have risen to the top of politics and the media.

It is all corporate games.

I think you are concerned either way. You don’t want him there regardless of how he is there. I am being presumptuous, I do realise.

Pretty desparate. Calling Hollywood. Come save us with all your fiction writers and production values.

Proverb for the day.

One can have high iq and be a high functioning psychopath.

Have I told you lately what a beautiful person you are?
If I haven't, Benkei, you are a beautiful person — ArguingWAristotleTiff

Oi! I saw his butt first.

Love means nothing......to a tennis player.

Sorry. Me try harder.

Or is it when it is difficult to formulate sentences? Just askin.

Ok. This is therefore how I interpret your thumbs up emoticon. Given it is at the end of what you said and not put with a reply to someone else, it appears to be a self congratulatory gesture.

How with the program was I with this?

I think we are all subject to “the vat”. That being societal constructs.

Emoticons are for Facebook. Just saying.

We also agree on fun. See? Adversarial is not always necessary.

Fun is had even without your permission.