Suppose a poll(?) is affixed to the bottom of each submission with three options
3 [ ] "I enjoyed it."
2 [ ] "It's okay."
1 [ ] "Not for me."
Good catch. No downvotes, just upvotes. Zero point if not liked, 1 point if liked.Suppose a poll(?) is affixed to the bottom of each submission with three options
3 [ ] "I enjoyed it."
2 [ ] "It's okay."
1 [ ] "Not for me."
How exactly does the poll calculation work? Is it 3 points for "I enjoyed it" and 1 for "Not for me"? That would mean if 4 people read Story A and vote "Not for me" then it will win over Story B that has just a single "I enjoyed it". Is that right? — Michael
Haha! No mercy? :sweat:I'd add in an additional vote option:
1/3 [ ] "Substandard"
This vote will divide that contestant's total score by a third. — Hanover
IMO, genre is a marketing label more than anything else. Kinda biases prospective readers, don't you think?Baden -- for a quick description, please add the genre of each submission in the post. — Caldwell
Each voters gets to vote on more than one and up to all stories registering their subjective preferences rather than have to, in effect, choose which story they think is "the best". Any calculation is to score average satisfaction with each story and then compare those satisfaction scores to determine which story or stories in the contest are most satisfying to the readers rather "which is best" (whatever that means).@180 Proof -- is the layer of calculation to provide for how strongly a voter likes the story?
:up:I think posters should provide the genres in case I label them in a way they object to. — Baden
So, you can't hide the results?Sample here. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/13064/sample-story . Please vote on the sample everyone, so we make sure we get this straight. — Baden
Okay.Any calculation is to score average satisfaction with each story and then compare those satisfaction scores to determine which story or stories in the contest are most satisfying to the readers rather "which is best" (whatever that means). — 180 Proof
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.