Freud was said to be a regular cocaine user. — Jackson
Wouldn't it be an error to ascribe privileged status to the sober state of mind? Aren't both the sober and high states, both simply states, and so coequal? — hypericin
The concept of cognitive bias exists and is well supported by research even if people can't use it as a tool on themselves alone — Bylaw
If you want perfect and 100% certainty then apply to be something simpler like a toaster. — Bylaw
Oh, and of course it is falsifiable. You can easily test to see if someone's poltical position affects what they notice in articles. — Bylaw
They can point out when you contradict yourself. And this kind of dialogue (which hopefully is mutual) can and does reduce people's biases — Bylaw
I'd call it "equivocation" -- because you both mean different things by "selfish" — Moliere
Suppressed correlative fallacy. — DingoJones
That's bosiness — baker
Anti-difference-of-degree-ism — emancipate
they have a specific contextual reason for making that statement at that time to that person — Joshs
they were choosing to ignore the specific contextual sense of the phrase in favor of a generic meaning — Joshs
Possibly hyperbole - deliberate exaggeration — RussellA
Context insensitivity — Joshs
Context-insensitive expressions are governed by linguistic rules that determine their contents (semantic values), which remain invariant in all contexts of utterance.
certainty brings insanity”, Certainty is not possible. — ArielAssante
excessive thinking not good. Tends toward narcissism — ArielAssante
. It is a useful concept, I think, AND people can use it terribly. — Bylaw
Work to make the unconscious conscious. The few who attempt to do so find it is a long, painful process. — ArielAssante
remediating it (by whatever amount) is better than not, don't you think? — Pantagruel
I'm not sure I understand how you are connecting cognitive bias theory with critical thinking. In what sense are you proposing they are connected? — Tom Storm
Actually that is exactly what it means. It seems you are coming from some kind of radically anti-scientific bias. All in good fun I guess, but not a good use of my time. — Pantagruel
but by drawing pictures on the board and describing the underlying concept students could see through the complications and comprehend a rational argument that implied the result — jgill
But I think this thread is more about political biases. — jgill
Experimentation requires quantifiable results. Statistical are quantitative. — Pantagruel
Another weird thread that starts with a slightly off OP and gets worse as it proceeds. — Banno
Cognitive bias is not one thing — Banno
The example in the OP is not an instance of cognitive bias. — Banno
We can adjust for Cognitive bias by being aware of them, giving consideration to what justifies our beliefs and by subjecting our beliefs to public critique. — Banno
You are denying accepted psychology. — Banno
confirmation bias distorts news all the time and is a threat to democracy. — jgill
Many of these biases have been tested in experimental conditions, — Pantagruel
Consider the law of small numbers bias. If you are aware of the tendency to make judgements based on unreasonably small sample sizes, then you can suspend judgment pending more data — Pantagruel
Cognitive biases are quantitatively measurable — Pantagruel
Brains are survival machines, not truth machines! — Agent Smith
Yet, some people are more biased to accept the word of God, than others. — Gnomon
Here are examples of questions that I think have very, very little meaning or interest, because of what I have outlined above.
Is God existent?
Is morality objective?
Is [insert literally anything] true?
Is [insert literally anything] moral?
Is life/ humanity inherently good/ bad? — SatmBopd
What is generally understood, and what do I specifically understand, by the concept of God, and why? — SatmBopd
mind boy dualism is by many considered to be untenable. What he did (possibly, I wasn't there of course) was show you how this assumption, which is deeply problematic, was made in your argument. — Tobias
Philosophy questions, it does not give answers but puts those on the spot that would like to provide an answer. — Tobias
Well, you can of course, but you will run into problems because you have unwittingly accepted a whole lot of assumptions that they carry around with them. — Tobias
But I can understand your frustration cause though I find it necessary ,sometimes the overanalysis ends up ridiculous. — dimosthenis9
How do you imagine that method? — dimosthenis9
wasn't he doing what philosophy ought to do? — Tobias
On the questions that were left.... he had no opinion. Of course not, because probably they were questions best left to science and he is no scientist. In one of my classes (not in uni but at a private course) a student exclaimed "are we getting any answers!". I answered "no, only better questions". — Tobias
The counter argument of course is that in many philosophical theories (of any kind of field) science plays a crucial role indeed — dimosthenis9
Maybe he wants to suggest a science based philosophy that would unify all fields or something like that — dimosthenis9
but the style in which it is presented is insulting. 'All these philo profs have gotten it all wrong, they are not wise, instead we should be 'independent thinker' (essentially like me! me! me!). — Tobias
Respectively, please state the thesis you are arguing for. — Jackson
You are asking everyone to read your OP and accusing them of not reading well. when your readers do not know what you are on about, probably the writing sucks. — Tobias
but it does not use scientific concepts to examine themselves. — Tobias
I do not think you yourself understand what you mean and I do not think you are able to. — Tobias
My conclusion as well. — Jackson
Well go ahead study cultural sociology, or macro economics or big history — Tobias
The emergence of science is a moment in men's becoming self aware. That can never be refuted or proven by scientific theory, the picture is actually too big. — Tobias
Why would you want to use the object of enquiry to examine the object of enquiry? — Tobias
The "science-based Philosophy" is the study of a subject that is done through the scientific method that renders verifiable findings by observation or experience rather than theory or subjective approach via logic. — Rocco Rosano
Because science pretends to search for truth, while in reality it's objective is far more obscure — Hillary
Science can't pull itself up by it's bootstraps. That's the thing, one of the things, that philosophy is needed for. — T Clark
If you want to explain everything there is simply no way to do it through science. — chiknsld
you really seem to want is to limit philosophy to the scientific method — Tobias
You also neglect the fact that such a jump requires a lot of interpretation but how that is done remains unclear — Tobias
Your plea for independence in fact comes down to a plea for reductionism and dependence, limiting rather than expanding our avenues of thought — Tobias
It would do away with Popper 's methodology! — Hillary
If you really have no idea what philosophers of science do then you need to find out. I mean, this is extremely elementary — Jackson
The philosophy of science does nothing but discuss scientific concepts. — Jackson
Defining basic concepts is what the philosophy of science does. You seemed to reject this idea but I did not understand why. — Jackson
It seems that you're interested in science and not philosophy. Hard to get much more than that from your explanation. — Jackson
Please do. — Jackson